The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms
Open accessAbstract
This study is part of ongoing efforts to characterize and determine the neural bases of presbycusis. These efforts utilize humans and animals in sets of overlapping hypotheses and experiments. Here, 50 young adult and elderly subjects, with normal audiometric thresholds or high-frequency hearing loss, were presented three types of linguistic materials at suprathreshold levels to determine speech recognition performance in noise. The study sought to determine how peripheral and central auditory system dysfunctions might be implicated in the speech recognition problems of elderly humans. There were four main findings. (1) Peripheral auditory nervous system pathologies, manifested as reduced sensitivity for speech-frequency pure tones and speech materials, contribute to elevated speech reception thresholds in quiet, and to reduced speech recognition in noise. (2) Good cognitive ability was demonstrated in the old subjects who took advantage of supportive context as well or better than young subjects, strongly indicating that the cortical portions of the speech/language nervous system did not account for the speech understanding dysfunctions of the old subjects. (3) When audibility and cognitive functioning were not affected, the demonstrated speech-recognition in-noise dysfunction remained in old subjects. This implicates auditory brainstem or auditory cortex temporal-resolution dysfunctions in accounting for the observed differences in speech processing. (4) Performance differences between young and elderly subjects with elevated thresholds illustrate the effects of age plus hearing loss and thereby implicate both peripheral and central dysfunctions in presbycusics. This is because the differences in performance between young and elderly subjects with normal peripheral sensitivity identified a central auditory dysfunction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise.
Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., & Daneman, M. (1995) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.412282 · Cited by 1,089
Davis, A. C., Ostri, B., & Parving, A. (1991) · Acta Oto-Laryngologica · doi:10.3109/00016489109127251 · Cited by 80
Cited by
Akeroyd, M. A. (2008) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.1080/14992020802301142 · Cited by 688
Inhibitory neurotransmission, plasticity and aging in the mammalian central auditory system
Caspary, D. M., Ling, L., Turner, J. G., & Hughes, L. F. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.013581 · Cited by 481
Viana, L. M., O'Malley, J. T., Burgess, B. J., Jones, D. D., Oliveira, C. A. C. P., Santos, F., Merchant, S. N., Liberman, L. D., & Liberman, M. C. (2015) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2015.04.014 · Cited by 372
Cognitive aging and auditory information processing
Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2003) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/14992020309074641 · Cited by 339
Musicians experience less age-related decline in central auditory processing.
Zendel, B. R., & Alain, C. (2012) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0024816 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Frisina, D. R., & Frisina, R. D.
- Venue
- Hearing Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 95-104
- ISSN
- 0378-5955 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127399017
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00006-3
- The paper
- Frisina, D. R., & Frisina, R. D. (1997). Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms. Hearing Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00006-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.