Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 424

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms

Open access
Frisina, D.Robert, Frisina, Robert D·1997·Hearing Research

Abstract

This study is part of ongoing efforts to characterize and determine the neural bases of presbycusis. These efforts utilize humans and animals in sets of overlapping hypotheses and experiments. Here, 50 young adult and elderly subjects, with normal audiometric thresholds or high-frequency hearing loss, were presented three types of linguistic materials at suprathreshold levels to determine speech recognition performance in noise. The study sought to determine how peripheral and central auditory system dysfunctions might be implicated in the speech recognition problems of elderly humans. There were four main findings. (1) Peripheral auditory nervous system pathologies, manifested as reduced sensitivity for speech-frequency pure tones and speech materials, contribute to elevated speech reception thresholds in quiet, and to reduced speech recognition in noise. (2) Good cognitive ability was demonstrated in the old subjects who took advantage of supportive context as well or better than young subjects, strongly indicating that the cortical portions of the speech/language nervous system did not account for the speech understanding dysfunctions of the old subjects. (3) When audibility and cognitive functioning were not affected, the demonstrated speech-recognition in-noise dysfunction remained in old subjects. This implicates auditory brainstem or auditory cortex temporal-resolution dysfunctions in accounting for the observed differences in speech processing. (4) Performance differences between young and elderly subjects with elevated thresholds illustrate the effects of age plus hearing loss and thereby implicate both peripheral and central dysfunctions in presbycusics. This is because the differences in performance between young and elderly subjects with normal peripheral sensitivity identified a central auditory dysfunction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00006-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 424

Metadata

Authors
Frisina, D. R., & Frisina, R. D.
Venue
Hearing Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-04
Volume
106
Issue
1-2
Pages
95-104
ISSN
0378-5955 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127399017
Cited by
424
References
2
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00006-3
The paper
Frisina, D. R., & Frisina, R. D. (1997). Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms. Hearing Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00006-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.