Cited by 1,089Hearing Loss and RehabilitationPhonetics and Phonology ResearchNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise.

Pichora-Fuller, M. Kathleen, Schneider, Bruce A., Daneman, Meredyth·1995·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

Two experiments using the materials of the Revised Speech Perception in Noise (SPIN-R) Test [Bilger et al., J. Speech Hear. Res. 27, 32–48 (1984)] were conducted to investigate age-related differences in the identification and the recall of sentence-final words heard in a babble background. In experiment 1, the level of the babble was varied to determine psychometric functions (percent correct word identification as a function of S/N ratio) for presbycusics, old adults with near-normal hearing, and young normal-hearing adults, when the sentence-final words were either predictable (high context) or unpredictable (low context). Differences between the psychometric functions for high- and low-context conditions were used to show that both groups of old listeners derived more benefit from supportive context than did young listeners. In experiment 2, a working memory task [Daneman and Carpenter, J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 19, 450–466 (1980)] was added to the SPIN task for young and old adults. Specifically, after listening to and identifying the sentence-final words for a block of n sentences, the subjects were asked to recall the last n words that they had identified. Old subjects recalled fewer of the items they had perceived than did young subjects in all S/N conditions, even though there was no difference in the recall ability of the two age groups when sentences were read. Furthermore, the number of items recalled by both age groups was reduced in adverse S/N conditions. The results were interpreted as supporting a processing model in which reallocable processing resources are used to support auditory processing when listening becomes difficult either because of noise, or because of age-related deterioration in the auditory system. Because of this reallocation, these resources are unavailable to more central cognitive processes such as the storage and retrieval functions of working memory, so that ‘‘upstream’’ processing of auditory information is adversely affected.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1121/1.412282

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By manipulating input-related demands and measuring listening span, it is possible to examine the effects of the manipulation on the allocation of capacity.

    “By manipulating input-related demands (e.g., the amount or type of background noise) and measuring listening span, it is possible to examine the effects of the manipulation on the allocation of capacity (e.g., Pichora-Fuller et al. 1995).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., & Daneman, M.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
1995-01-01
Volume
97
Issue
1
Pages
593-608
ISSN
  • 0001-4966 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8524
OpenAlex
W2167685324
Cited by
1,089
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 50
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
speech perception in noise, age-related hearing loss, sentence-final words, word recall, working memory, context effects, babble, psychometric functions, signal-to-noise ratio, older adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aging, Auditory Threshold, Cognition, Hearing, Humans, Memory, Memory, Short-Term, Noise, Presbycusis, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review