Using a case study to test the role of three key social enablers in ERP implementation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ERP implementation is a complex IT-related social phenomenon with a large body of knowledge.
“Implementation of an ERP system is a complex IT-related social phenomenon with a large body of knowledge (Sarker and Lee [24]).”
From Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Implementation: A Case for User Participation (2013) · cites this paper as Sarker and Lee [24]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 344
- Authors
- Sarker, S., & Lee, A. S.
- Affiliations
- Washington State University (US)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sarker, Suprateek
- Venue
- Information & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 813-829
- ISSN
- 0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138915272
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 24.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information & Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Keywords
- enterprise resource planning, ERP implementation, leadership, open communication, implementation success, necessary conditions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
