A taxonomy of players and activities across the ERP project life cycle
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The post-implementation period of the ERP life cycle is not well understood.
“The focus was on the post-implementation period of the ERP life cycle, which is not well understood (Somers & Nelson, 2004).”
From An Explanatory Framework for Achieving Business Benefits from ERP Systems (2012) · cites this paper as Somers & Nelson, 2004
After successful implementation the user usually becomes dependent on the ERP vendor for assistance and updates.
“After the successful implementation the user usually becomes dependent on the ERP vendor for assistance and updates (Somers and Nelson [26]; Wu and Wang [30]).”
From Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Implementation: A Case for User Participation (2013) · cites this paper as Somers and Nelson [26]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 694
- Authors
- Somers, T. M., & Nelson, K. G.
- Affiliations
- Wayne State University (US)
- University of Tampa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Somers, Toni M.
- ORCID
- Somers, Toni M.
- Venue
- Information & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 257-278
- ISSN
- 0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034785598
- Cited by
- 694
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 62
- FWCI
- 23.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information & Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Keywords
- enterprise resource planning, ERP implementation, project life cycle, key players, implementation activities, information theory, resource allocation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
