Traditional Tongan cures for morning sickness and their mutagenic/toxicological evaluations
Abstract
Every year millions of women become pregnant, and more than 60% of them will develop some form of morning sickness. Yet drugs like Thalidomide, Bendectin and other possibly potent teratogens administered for pre-partum nausea have severely limited any medicinal intervention. In Tonga, women have been treated for morning sickness for hundreds of years. Two types of traditional treatments exist, the first one consists of an infusion of fresh leaves, commonly called vai momoko. The second type of treatment is called vai haka, which is made from the boiled bark of several trees. In this paper we describe the results of 6 months of intensive interviews in Tonga regarding the second type of treatment called vai haka. In addition, we tested vai haka for mutagenic and teratogenic effects. Data from the Ames TA-98 mutagenic bioassay clearly indicate that vai haka is not mutagenic with or without S-9 activation. Twenty-six experimental CD-1 white mice were gavaged with 0.1 ml of vai haka (at 540xthe human dose) while the control group of 17 mice were gavaged with 0.1 ml of water to determine teratogenic and developmental effects of the vai haka. No significant teratogenic or developmental anomalies occurred in the mice dosed with vai haka compared to the controls.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The possible and potential pharmaceutical properties of plants are overplayed.
“The possible and potential pharmaceutical properties of plants are overplayed (eg Ostraff et al. 2000).”
From ‘Traditional’ Healers, Speaking and Motivation in Vava'u, Tonga: Explaining Syncretism and Addressing Health Policy (2010) · cites this paper as Ostraff et al. 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Poltorak, M. (2010) · Oceania · doi:10.1002/j.1834-4461.2010.tb00069.x · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ostraff, M., Anitoni, K., Nicholson, A., & Booth, G. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Victoria (CA)
- Brigham Young University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Ethnopharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 201-209
- ISSN
- 0378-8741 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966389559
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Ethnopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Brigham Young University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
- Keywords
- nausea and vomiting of pregnancy, traditional medicine, medicinal plants, mutagenicity, teratogenicity, developmental toxicity, pregnancy, ethnobotany
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Animals, Female, Gastrointestinal Agents, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Medicine, Traditional, Mutagenicity Tests, Mutagens, Nausea, Plant Extracts, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Tonga, Plant Epidermis, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review