Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 984

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

CFT's from Calabi–Yau four-folds

Open access
Gukov, Sergei, Vafa, Cumrun, Witten, Edward·2000·Nuclear Physics B

Abstract

We consider F/M/Type IIA theory compactified to four, three, or two dimensions on a Calabi–Yau four-fold, and study the behavior near an isolated singularity in the presence of appropriate fluxes and branes. We analyze the vacuum and soliton structure of these models, and show that near an isolated singularity, one often generates massless chiral superfields and a superpotential, and in many instances in two or three dimensions one obtains nontrivial superconformal field theories. In the case of two dimensions, we identify some of these theories with certain Kazama–Suzuki coset models, such as the N=2 minimal models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0550-3213(00)00373-4

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 984

Metadata

Authors
Gukov, S., Vafa, C., & Witten, E.
Venue
Nuclear Physics B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-09
Volume
584
Issue
1-2
Pages
69-108
ISSN
0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994544882
Cited by
984
References
0
FWCI
25.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CFT's from Calabi–Yau four-folds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0550-3213(00)00373-4
The paper
Gukov, S., Vafa, C., & Witten, E. (2000). CFT's from Calabi–Yau four-folds. Nuclear Physics B. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0550-3213(00)00373-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.