CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 791Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The statistics of string/M theory vacua

Open access
Douglas, Michael R·2003·Journal of High Energy Physics
DOI 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/046
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/046

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • String theory supports an enormous landscape of metastable vacua.

    “Indeed this view of cosmology is supported by the present understanding of string theory, which argues for the existence of an enormous landscape of such metastable vacua [5,6,7,8].”

    From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [7]

    The General introduction says string/M theory appears to describe a very large number of vacua. Section 3.6, however, says metastability still needs to be checked for a vacuum with the appropriate cosmological constant, although it expects that constraint to be mild. The paper therefore supports an enormous multiplicity of vacua, but does not establish that an enormous number are metastable. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.131301 · DOI
  2. T. Banks, 1988, Nucl. Phys., 307, 93, 10.1016/0550-3213(88)90523-8 · DOI
  3. E. Witten, 1982, Nucl. Phys., 202, 253, 10.1016/0550-3213(82)90071-2 · DOI
  4. A.D. King, 1994, Quart. J. Math. Oxford, 45
  5. F. Cachazo, 2002, J. High Energy Phys., 2002, 071, 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/12/071 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0550-3213(85)90602-9 · DOI
  7. M.B. Green, 1984, Phys. Lett., 149, 117, 10.1016/0370-2693(84)91565-X · DOI
  8. E. Witten, 1996, Nucl. Phys., 460, 541, 10.1016/0550-3213(95)00625-7 · DOI
  9. M. Kreuzer, 2002, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 4, 1209, 10.4310/ATMP.2000.v4.n6.a2 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0550-3213(91)90292-6 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0550-3213(94)90595-9 · DOI
  12. C. Angelantonj, 2002, Phys. Rep., 371, 1, 10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00273-9 · DOI
  13. M. Cvetic, 2001, Nucl. Phys., 615, 3, 10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00427-8 · DOI
  14. D.-E. Diaconescu, 1998, J. High Energy Phys., 1998, 013, 10.1088/1126-6708/1998/02/013 · DOI
  15. F. Cachazo, 2002, Nucl. Phys., 628, 3, 10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00078-0 · DOI
  16. B. Fiol, 2002, J. High Energy Phys., 2002, 058, 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/07/058 · DOI
  17. D. Gepner, 1988, Nucl. Phys., 296, 757, 10.1016/0550-3213(88)90397-5 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/0370-2693(96)00345-0 · DOI · Paper page
  19. F. Denef, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 050, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/08/050 · DOI
  20. C. Vafa, 1998, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2, 207, 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n1.a8 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0550-3213(94)00023-8 · DOI
  22. C.E. Beasley, 2001, J. High Energy Phys., 2001, 001, 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/12/001 · DOI
  23. B. Feng, 2001, J. High Energy Phys., 2001, 035, 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/12/035 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/0550-3213(94)90321-2 · DOI
  25. R.Y. Donagi, 1997, Asian J. Math., 1, 214, 10.4310/AJM.1997.v1.n2.a1 · DOI
  26. R. Friedman, 1999, J. Alg. Geom., 8
  27. A. Strominger, 1986, Nucl. Phys., 274, 253, 10.1016/0550-3213(86)90286-5 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01219-1 · DOI
  29. K. Becker, 1996, Nucl. Phys., 477, 155, 10.1016/0550-3213(96)00367-7 · DOI · Paper page
  30. K. Dasgupta, 1999, J. High Energy Phys., 1999, 023, 10.1088/1126-6708/1999/08/023 · DOI
  31. 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.106006 · DOI
  32. R. Bousso, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 006, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/06/006 · DOI · Paper page
  33. J.L. Feng, 2001, Nucl. Phys., 602, 307, 10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00097-9 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/0550-3213(88)90559-7 · DOI
  35. P.K. Tripathy, 2003, J. High Energy Phys., 2003, 028, 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/03/028 · DOI
  36. S. Gukov, 2000, Nucl. Phys., 584, 69, 10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00373-4 · DOI
  37. 10.1063/1.1376161 · DOI
  38. K. Becker, 2002, J. High Energy Phys., 2002, 060, 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/06/060 · DOI
  39. P.S. Aspinwall, 2002, J. High Energy Phys., 2002, 031, 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/05/031 · DOI
  40. J.M. Maldacena, 1998, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2, 231, 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1 · DOI · Paper page
  41. R. Gopakumar, 1999, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 3, 1415, 10.4310/ATMP.1999.v3.n5.a5 · DOI
  42. H. Ooguri, 2002, Nucl. Phys., 641, 3, 10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00620-X · DOI
  43. F. Cachazo, 2003, J. High Energy Phys., 2003, 042, 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/02/042 · DOI
  44. F. Tanaka, 1980, J. Phys. F: Metal Phys., 10
  45. P. Bleher, 2000, Comm. Math. Phys., 208, 771, 10.1007/s002200050010 · DOI
  46. Y. Shadmi, 2000, Rev. Mod. Phys., 72, 25, 10.1103/RevModPhys.72.25 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Douglas, M. R.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Douglas, Michael R
ORCID
Douglas, Michael R
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2003-05-19
Volume
2003
Issue
05
Pages
046-046
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/046
OpenAlex
W2163104504
Cited by
791
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 21
FWCI
35.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐FG02‐, FG02-96ER40959)
  • Banff International Research Station for Mathematical Innovation and Discovery
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
string vacua, universality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review