The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Out of this world supersymmetry breaking
Open accessAbstract
Abstract We show that in a general hidden sector model, supersymmetry breaking necessarily generates at one loop a scalar and gaugino mass as a consequence of the super-Weyl anomaly. We study a scenario in which this contribution dominates. We consider the Standard Model particles to be localized on a (3 + 1)-dimensional subspace or “3-brane” of a higher dimensional space-time, while supersymmetry breaking occurs off the 3-brane, either in the bulk or on another 3-brane. At least one extra dimension is assumed to be compactified roughly one to two orders of magnitude below the four-dimensional Planck scale. This framework is phenomenologically very attractive; it introduces new possibilities for solving the supersymmetric flavor problem, the gaugino mass problem, the supersymmetric CP problem, and the μ-problem. Furthermore, the compactification scale can be consistent with a unification of gauge and gravitational couplings. We demonstrate these claims in a four-dimensional effective theory below the compactification scale that incorporates the relevant features of the underlying higher dimensional theory and the contribution of the super-Weyl anomaly. Naturalness constraints follow not only from symmetries but also from the higher dimensional origins of the theory. We also introduce additional bulk contributions to the MSSM soft masses. This scenario is very predictive: the gaugino masses, squark masses, and A terms are given in terms of MSSM renormalization group functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter
Arkani–Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S., & Dvali, G. (1998) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00466-3 · Cited by 6,563
Heterotic and Type I string dynamics from eleven dimensions
Hořava, P., & Witten, E. (1996) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00621-4 · Cited by 1,984
Cited by
Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints
Bertone, G., Hooper, D., & Silk, J. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 · Cited by 4,979
Douglas, M. R., & Kachru, S. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.733 · Cited by 1,122
Effects of cosmological moduli fields on cosmic microwave background
Moroi, T., & Takahashi, T. (2001) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(01)01295-3 · Cited by 938
Compact hyperbolic extra dimension: a M-theory solution and its implications for the LHC
Orlando, D., & Chan Park, S. (2010) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2010)006 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Randall, L., & Sundrum, R.
- Venue
- Nuclear Physics B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 557
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 79-118
- ISSN
- 0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998924215
- Cited by
- 1,446
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 44.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Out of this world supersymmetry breaking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0550-3213(99)00359-4
- The paper
- Randall, L., & Sundrum, R. (1999). Out of this world supersymmetry breaking. Nuclear Physics B. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0550-3213(99)00359-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.