Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,381

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The local power of some unit root tests for panel data

Open access
Breitung, Jörg·2004·Advances in Econometrics

Abstract

To test the hypothesis of a difference stationary time series against a trend stationary alternative, Levin & Lin (1993) and Im, Pesaran & Shin (1997) suggest bias adjusted t-statistics. Such corrections are necessary to account for the nonzero mean of the t-statistic in the case of an OLS detrending method. In this chapter the local power of panel unit root statistics against a sequence of local alternatives is studied. It is shown that the local power of the test statistics is affected by two different terms. The first term represents the asymptotic effect on the bias due to the detrending method and the second term is the usual location parameter of the limiting distribution under the sequence of local alternatives. It is argued that both terms can offset each other so that the test has no power against the sequence of local alternatives. These results suggest to construct test statistics based on alternative detrending methods. We consider a class of t-statistics that do not require a bias correction. The results of a Monte Carlo experiment suggest that avoiding the bias can improve the power of the test substantially.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0731-9053(00)15006-6

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. P.C.B. Phillips, Z. Xiao, 1998, Journal of Economic Surveys, 12, 423, 10.1111/1467-6419.00064 · doi:10.1111/1467-6419.00064
  2. P. Schmidt, P.C.B. Phillips, 1992, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54, 257, 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1992.tb00002.x · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.1992.tb00002.x
  3. J. Breitung, 1997, Statistical Papers, 38, 253, 10.1007/BF02925268 · doi:10.1007/bf02925268

Metadata

Authors
Breitung, J.
Venue
Advances in Econometrics
Published
2004-05-19
Pages
161-177
ISSN
0731-9053 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1662681156
Cited by
2,381
References
24
FWCI
118.11
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0731-9053(00)15006-6
The paper
Breitung, J. (2004). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Advances in Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0731-9053(00)15006-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.