The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The local power of some unit root tests for panel data
Open accessAbstract
To test the hypothesis of a difference stationary time series against a trend stationary alternative, Levin & Lin (1993) and Im, Pesaran & Shin (1997) suggest bias adjusted t-statistics. Such corrections are necessary to account for the nonzero mean of the t-statistic in the case of an OLS detrending method. In this chapter the local power of panel unit root statistics against a sequence of local alternatives is studied. It is shown that the local power of the test statistics is affected by two different terms. The first term represents the asymptotic effect on the bias due to the detrending method and the second term is the usual location parameter of the limiting distribution under the sequence of local alternatives. It is argued that both terms can offset each other so that the test has no power against the sequence of local alternatives. These results suggest to construct test statistics based on alternative detrending methods. We consider a class of t-statistics that do not require a bias correction. The results of a Monte Carlo experiment suggest that avoiding the bias can improve the power of the test substantially.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root
Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531 · Cited by 23,211
Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-d · Cited by 19,880
Testing for a unit root in time series regression
PHILLIPS, P. C. B., & PERRON, P. (1988) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/75.2.335 · Cited by 19,155
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
Baltagi, B. H. (2021) · Springer Texts in Business and Economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5 · Cited by 15,104
Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties
Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., & James Chu, C.-S. (2002) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(01)00098-7 · Cited by 12,849
Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects
Nickell, S. (1981) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911408 · Cited by 8,735
Hsiao, C. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139839327 · Cited by 7,869
Hsiao, C. (2022) · doi:10.1017/9781009057745 · Cited by 7,869
Journal of The American Statistical Association
Fienberg, S. E. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences · doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess1317 · Cited by 6,125
Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data
Kao, C. (1999) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00023-2 · Cited by 5,763
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- P.C.B. Phillips, Z. Xiao, 1998, Journal of Economic Surveys, 12, 423, 10.1111/1467-6419.00064 · doi:10.1111/1467-6419.00064
- P. Schmidt, P.C.B. Phillips, 1992, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54, 257, 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1992.tb00002.x · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.1992.tb00002.x
- J. Breitung, 1997, Statistical Papers, 38, 253, 10.1007/BF02925268 · doi:10.1007/bf02925268
Cited by
Kasman, A., & Duman, Y. S. (2015) · Economic Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.022 · Cited by 1,244
Shafiei, S., & Salim, R. A. (2014) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.064 · Cited by 1,127
Financial development and economic growth: evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests
Christopoulos, D. K., & Tsionas, E. G. (2004) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.03.002 · Cited by 1,049
Ben Jebli, M., Ben Youssef, S., & Ozturk, I. (2016) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.031 · Cited by 911
CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries
Pao, H.-T., & Tsai, C.-M. (2010) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.045 · Cited by 890
Metadata
- Authors
- Breitung, J.
- Venue
- Advances in Econometrics
- Publisher
- Emerald (MCB UP )
- Published
- 2004-05-19
- Pages
- 161-177
- ISSN
- 0731-9053 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1662681156
- Cited by
- 2,381
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 118.11
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0731-9053(00)15006-6
- The paper
- Breitung, J. (2004). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Advances in Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0731-9053(00)15006-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.