Differences in inducibility and prognosis of in-hospital versus out-of-hospital identified nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease: Clinical and trial design implications
Open accessAbstract
Objectives The goal of this study was to describe the influence of the clinical setting (in-hospital vs. out-of-hospital) in which nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) is discovered on the rate of inducibility of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), arrhythmic events and survival in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction.Background In-hospital presentation of sustained VT is independently associated with lower long-term overall survival. The impact of the clinical setting in which NSVT is documented is unknown.Methods In the Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT), designed to assess the benefit of randomized antiarrhythmic therapy guided by electrophysiologic testing in patients with asymptomatic NSVT, CAD and LV dysfunction, eligible patients were enrolled irrespective of the setting in which the index arrhythmia was discovered. In this retrospective analysis, we compared the rate of VT inducibility and outcome of MUSTT-enrolled patients with in-hospital versus out-of-hospital presentation of NSVT.Results Monomorphic sustained VT was induced in 35% and 28% of the patients whose index NSVT occurred in-hospital and out-of-hospital, respectively (adjusted p = 0.006). Cardiac arrest or death due to arrhythmia at two- and five-year follow-ups were 14% and 28% for untreated patients with in-hospital-identified NSVT and 11% and 21% for the out-of-hospital group (adjusted p = 0.10). Overall mortality rates at two- and five-year follow-ups were 24% and 48% for inpatients and 18% and 38% for outpatients (adjusted p = 0.018). In patients randomized to antiarrhythmic therapy, there was no significant interaction between patient status (in-hospital vs. out-of-hospital) and treatment impact on the rates of total mortality (p = 0.98) and arrhythmic events (p = 0.08).Conclusions In patients with CAD and impaired LV function, asymptomatic NSVT identified in-hospital, compared with that identified out-of-hospital, is associated with a higher rate of induction of sustained VT and overall mortality. Therefore, in similar patients, the clinical setting in which NSVT is discovered should be taken into account when formulating patient risk, treatment and clinical trial design.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the late (>24 hr) post-acute MI inpatient period, detection of NSVT episodes has been associated with a higher rate of sustained VT and subsequent increased mortality.
“In the late (.24 hr) postacute MI inpatient period, the detection of NSVT episodes has been associated with a higher rate of sustained VT and with subsequent increased mortality”
From 2017 ISHNE-HRS expert consensus statement on ambulatory ECG and external cardiac monitoring/telemetry (2017) · cites this paper as Pires et al., 2001
The Results and Discussion report that, among patients with coronary artery disease and impaired left ventricular function, in-hospital identification of NSVT was associated with greater inducibility of sustained VT and higher overall mortality than out-of-hospital identification. The paper does not establish this specifically for the >24-hour post-acute-MI inpatient period, and the higher sustained-VT finding concerns VT induced during testing rather than a clearly higher rate of subsequent spontaneous sustained VT. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A Randomized Study of the Prevention of Sudden Death in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
Buxton, A. E., Lee, K. L., Fisher, J. D., Josephson, M. E., Prystowsky, E. N., & Hafley, G. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199912163412503 · Cited by 2,489 · see citing works
Self-citationBuxton, A. E., Lee, K. L., DiCarlo, L. A., Gold, M. R., Greer, G. S., Prystowsky, E. N., O’Toole, M. F., TANG, A. S. L., Fisher, J. D., Coromilas, J., et al. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200006293422602 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
Self-citationRisk factors for sudden death after acute myocardial infarction: Two-year follow-up
Mukharji, J., Rude, R. E., Poole, W. K., Gustafson, N., Thomas, L. J., Strausś, H. W., Jaffe, A. S., Muller, J. E., Roberts, R., Raabe, D. S., et al. (1984) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0002-9149(84)90299-6 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Bigger, J. T., Weld, F. M., & Rolnitzky, L. M. (1981) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0002-9149(81)90344-1 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Wilber, D. J., Olshansky, B., Moran, J. F., & Scanlon, P. J. (1990) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.82.2.350 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Anderson, K. P., DeCamilla, J. J., & Moss, A. J. (1978) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.57.5.890 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Buxton, A. E., Fisher, J. D., Josephson, M. E., Lee, K. L., Pryor, D. B., Prystowsky, E. N., Simson, M. B., DiCarlo, L. A., Echt, D. S., Packer, D. L., et al. (1993) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/0033-0620(93)90015-6 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Self-citationGomes, J. A., Hariman, R. I., Kang, P. S., El-Sherif, N., Chowdhry, I. H., & Lyons, J. (1984) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.70.1.43 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Buxton, A. E., Marchlinski, F. E., Flores, B. T., Miller, J. M., Doherty, J. U., & Josephson, M. E. (1987) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.75.6.1178 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Self-citationKlein, R. C., & Machell, C. (1989) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(89)90066-1 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Kleiger, R. E., Miller, J. P., Thanavaro, S., Province, M. A., Martin, T. F., & Oliver, G. C. (1981) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.63.1.64 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Denes, P., Gillis, A. M., Yudi Pawitan, Y., Kammerling, J. M., Wilhelmsen, L., Salerno, D. M., & The CAST Investigators (1991) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0002-9149(91)90404-9 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Buxton, A. E., Hafley, G. E., Lehmann, M. H., Gold, M. R., O’Toole, M., Tang, A., Coromilas, J., Hook, B. G., Stamato, N. J., & Lee, K. L. (1999) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.99.14.1843 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationValue of electrophysiologic testing in patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia
Sulpizi, A. M., Friehling, T. D., & Kowey, P. R. (1987) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0002-9149(87)91103-9 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Bhandari, A. K., Au, P. K., Rose, J. S., et al. (1987) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0002-9149(87)90800-9 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Manolis, A. S., & Estes, N. A. M. (1990) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0002-9149(90)90085-f · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Pinski, S. L., Yao, Q., Epstein, A. E., et al. (2000) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/s0002-8703(00)90011-5 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Usefulness of early versus late programmed ventricular stimulation in acute myocardial infarction
Nogami, A., Aonuma, K., Takahashi, A., et al. (1991) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0002-9149(91)90702-m · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Epstein, A. E., Powell, J. L., Yao, Q., Ocampo, C. M., Lancaster, S. E., Rosenberg, Y., Cannom, D. S., Herre, J. M., & Greene, H. L. (1999) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00305-8 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Prevention of Sudden Death in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
Aggarwal, A. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200004273421714 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia: Identification and management of high-risk patients
Pires, L. A., & Huang, S. K. S. (1993) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/s0002-8703(07)80028-7 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Epstein AE, Powell J, Yao Q, et al. In-hospital versus out-of-hospital 1161 JACC Vol. 38, No. 4, 2001
- Pires et al. October 2001:1156-62 Clinical Setting of Nonsustained VT presentation of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias predicts survival: results from the AVID registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1111-6.
- Pinski SL, Yao Q, Epstein AE, et al. Determinants of outcome in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: the Antiarrhyth- mics Versus Defibrillator study registry. Am Heart J 2000;139:804 -13.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zipes, D. P., Camm, A. J., Borggrefe, M., Buxton, A. E., Chaitman, B., Fromer, M., Gregoratos, G., Klein, G., Moss, A. J., Myerburg, R. J., et al. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.178233 · Cited by 1,080 · see citing works
Self-citationBuxton, A. E., Lee, K. L., Hafley, G. E., Pires, L. A., Fisher, J. D., Gold, M. R., Josephson, M. E., Lehmann, M. H., & Prystowsky, E. N. (2007) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.095 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Self-citationSteinberg, J. S., Varma, N., Cygankiewicz, I., Aziz, P., Balsam, P., Baranchuk, A., Cantillon, D. J., Dilaveris, P., Dubner, S. J., El-Sherif, N., et al. (2017) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.03.038 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Prognostic significance of ambulatory ECG monitoring for ventricular arrhythmias
Katritsis, D. G., Siontis, G. C. M., & Camm, A. J. (2013) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2013.07.005 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pires, L. A., Lehmann, M. H., Buxton, A. E., Hafley, G. E., & Lee, K. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Brown University (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1156-1162
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149842827
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5u01hl045726-06)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (UO1HL45700, UO1-HL45726, U01HL045700)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
- Keywords
- non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, coronary artery disease, left ventricular dysfunction, antiarrhythmic therapy, arrhythmic mortality, electrophysiologic testing, cardiac arrest
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Coronary Disease, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Comorbidity, Proportional Hazards Models, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Tachycardia, Ventricular, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review