CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 492Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementHeart rate and cardiovascular healthCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers in the management of left ventricular systolic dysfunction according to race, gender, and diabetic status

Open access
Shekelle, Paul G., Rich, Michael W., Morton, Sally C., Atkinson, Col.Sid W., Tu, Wenli, Maglione, Margaret, Rhodes, Shannon, Barrett, Michael, Fonarow, Gregg C., Greenberg, Barry, Heidenreich, Paul A., Knabel, Tom, Konstam, Marvin A., Steimle, Anthony, Warner Stevenson, Lynne·2003·Journal of the American College of Cardiology
DOI 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00262-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives This study sought to assess the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta-blockers on all-cause mortality in patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction according to gender, race, and the presence of diabetes.Background Major randomized clinical trials have established that ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers have life-saving benefits in patients with LV systolic dysfunction. Most patients enrolled in these trials were Caucasian men. Whether an equal effect is achieved in women, non-Caucasians, and patients with major comorbidities has not been established.Methods The authors performed a meta-analysis of published and individual patient data from the 12 largest randomized clinical trials of ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers to produce random effects estimates of mortality for subgroups.Results Data support beneficial reductions in all-cause mortality for the use of beta-blockers in men and women, the use of ACE inhibitors and some beta-blockers in black and white patients, and the use of ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers in patients with or without diabetes. Women with symptomatic LV systolic dysfunction probably benefit from ACE inhibitors, but women with asymptomatic LV systolic dysfunction may not have reduced mortality when treated with ACE inhibitors (pooled relative risk = 0.96; 95% confidence interval: 0.75 to 1.22). The pooled estimate of three beta-blocker studies supports a beneficial effect in black patients with heart failure, but one study assessing bucindolol reported a nonsignificant increase in mortality.Conclusions Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers provide life-saving benefits in most of the subpopulations assessed. Women with asymptomatic LV systolic dysfunction may not achieve a mortality benefit when treated with ACE inhibitors.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00262-6

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 492

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Shekelle, P. G., Rich, M. W., Morton, S. C., Atkinson, C. S. W., Tu, W., Maglione, M., Rhodes, S., Barrett, M., Fonarow, G. C., Greenberg, B., Heidenreich, P. A., Knabel, T., Konstam, M. A., Steimle, A., & Warner Stevenson, L.
Affiliations
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Northern California (US)
Corresponding author
Shekelle, Paul G.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-05
Volume
41
Issue
9
Pages
1529-1538
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00262-6
OpenAlex
W61639876
Cited by
492
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 28
FWCI
17.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (290-97-0000, 290-97-0001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, heart failure, all-cause mortality, subgroup analysis, sex differences, racial differences, diabetes mellitus, bucindolol, asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction, individual patient data
MeSH terms
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Male, Sex Factors, Systole, Survival Rate, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, Racial Groups, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review