Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 235

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A new pacemaker algorithm for the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Open access
Carlson, Mark D, Ip, John, Messenger, John, Beau, Scott, Kalbfleisch, Steven, Gervais, Pierre, Cameron, Douglas A, Duran, Aurelio, Val-Mejias, Jesus, Mackall, Judith, Gold, Michael·2003·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The Atrial Dynamic Overdrive Pacing Trial (ADOPT) was a single blind, randomized, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the atrial fibrillation (AF) Suppression Algorithm (St. Jude Medical Cardiac Rhythm Management Division, Sylmar, California) in patients with sick sinus syndrome and AF. BACKGROUND This algorithm increases the pacing rate when the native rhythm emerges and periodically reduces the rate to search for intrinsic atrial activity. METHODS Symptomatic AF burden (percentage of days during which symptomatic AF occurred) was the primary end point. Patients underwent pacemaker implantation, were randomized to DDDR with the algorithm on (treatment) or off (control), and were followed for six months. RESULTS Baseline characteristics and antiarrhythmic drugs used were similar in both groups. The percentage of atrial pacing was higher in the treatment group (92.9% vs. 67.9%, p < 0.0001). The AF Suppression Algorithm reduced symptomatic AF burden by 25% (2.50% control vs. 1.87% treatment). Atrial fibrillation burden decreased progressively in both groups but was lower in the treatment group at each follow-up visit (one, three, and six months) (p = 0.005). Quality of life scores improved in both groups. The mean number of AF episodes (4.3 +/- 11.5 control vs. 3.2 +/- 8.6 treatment); total hospitalizations (17 control vs. 15 treatment); and incidence of complications, adverse events, and deaths were not statistically different between groups. CONCLUSIONS The ADOPT demonstrated that overdrive atrial pacing with the AF Suppression Algorithm decreased symptomatic AF burden significantly in patients with sick sinus syndrome and AF. The decrease in relative AF burden was substantial (25%), although the absolute difference was small (2.50% control vs. 1.87% treatment).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00780-0

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 235

Metadata

Authors
Carlson, M. D., Ip, J., Messenger, J., Beau, S., Kalbfleisch, S., Gervais, P., Cameron, D. A., Duran, A., Val-Mejias, J., Mackall, J., & Gold, M.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-08
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
627-633
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157905591
Cited by
235
References
3
FWCI
14.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new pacemaker algorithm for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00780-0
The paper
Carlson, M. D., Ip, J., Messenger, J., Beau, S., Kalbfleisch, S., Gervais, P., Cameron, D. A., Duran, A., Val-Mejias, J., Mackall, J., & Gold, M. (2003). A new pacemaker algorithm for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00780-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.