Cited by 6ECG Monitoring and AnalysisCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

PREDICTION OF THE HEART RATE CORRECTED QT INTERVAL (QTC) FROM A NOVEL, MULTILEAD SMARTPHONE-ENABLED ECG USING A DEEP NEURAL NETWORK

Open access
Schram, Matthew, Shreibati, Jacqueline Baras, Bos, Martijn, Galloway, Conner, Valys, Alexander, Petterson, Frank, Gundotra, Vic, Albert, Dave +4 more·2019·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0735-1097(19)30976-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schram, M., Shreibati, J. B., Bos, M., Galloway, C., Valys, A., Petterson, F., Gundotra, V., Albert, D., Attia, Z. I., Noseworthy, P., Friedman, P., & Ackerman, M.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
73
Issue
9
Pages
368
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2920507217
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
QTc interval, QTc prolongation, smartphone ECG, multi-lead ECG, deep neural network, arrhythmia prediction, cardiac arrest risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review