DOES NON-INVASIVE CARDIAC OUTPUT MONITORING (NICOM) CORRELATE WITH STANDARD INVASIVE HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE DECOMPENSATED HEART FAILURE?
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ICG has high error compared to reference standard invasive measures in broader populations with cardiovascular diseases and in patients with higher BMI.
“In healthy subjects with low body mass index (BMI), this technique can provide accurate measures of STIs; however, in broader populations with cardiovascular diseases and in patients with higher BMI, ICG has been shown to have high error compared to reference standard invasive measures [14,15]”
From A Chest‐Conformable, Wireless Electro‐Mechanical E‐Tattoo for Measuring Multiple Cardiac Time Intervals (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
The Results and Conclusion (p. 1) report that NICOM cardiac-output and cardiac-index measurements did not correlate with invasive Fick or thermodilution measurements in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. The paper identifies NICOM as a bioreactance technology, not ICG, and gives only a mean BMI; it does not establish high error for ICG or a specific finding in patients with higher BMI. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredICG provides accurate measures of STIs in healthy subjects with low body mass index (BMI).
“In healthy subjects with low body mass index (BMI), this technique can provide accurate measures of STIs; however, in broader populations with cardiovascular diseases and in patients with higher BMI, ICG has been shown to have high error compared to reference standard invasive measures [14,15]”
From A Chest‐Conformable, Wireless Electro‐Mechanical E‐Tattoo for Measuring Multiple Cardiac Time Intervals (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
The Methods and Results (p. 1) concern NICOM measurements of cardiac output and cardiac index in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Searches for healthy subjects, low BMI, ICG, and systolic time intervals found no passage assessing whether ICG accurately measures STIs in that population. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bhattacharya, S., Nikbakht, M., Alden, A., Tan, P., Wang, J., Alhalimi, T. A., Kim, S., Wang, P., Tanaka, H., Tandon, A., et al. (2023) · Advanced Electronic Materials · doi:10.1002/aelm.202201284 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rali, A., Buechler, T., Van-Gotten, B., Burgen, E., Chen, J., Shah, Z., Haglund, N., & Sauer, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 819
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2920143214
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
- Keywords
- noninvasive cardiac output monitoring, Nicom, cardiac output, cardiac index, pulmonary artery catheter, hemodynamic monitoring, acute decompensated heart failure, cardiogenic shock, thermodilution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
