The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reversal of dysfunction in postischemic stunned myocardium by epinephrine and postextrasystolic potentiation
Open accessAbstract
After brief coronary occlusions, myocardium may become "stunned," exhibiting prolonged depression of function despite the absence of necrosis. Because of the accompanying decline in adenosine triphosphate and adenine nucleotide precursors, a deficiency of energy supply has been proposed as the basis for postischemic dysfunction. This study examined whether sufficient functional and metabolic reserve exists in stunned myocardium to sustain a prolonged, maximal inotropic response to epinephrine and postextrasystolic potentiation. In 11 open chest dogs, the left anterior descending coronary artery was occluded for 5 minutes, followed by 10 minutes of reflow, repeated 12 times, with a final 1 hour recovery period. Regional myocardial function was measured using pairs of ultrasonic dimension crystals implanted in ischemic and nonischemic zones. During repetitive reflows a progressive decrease in mean systolic segment shortening occurred: baseline 21.8%, 1st reflow 15.2%, 12th reflow 4.3%, 1 hour recovery 7.9%. Intravenous epinephrine, titrated to produce a maximal inotropic response, caused segment shortening to increase to 21.6% after 10 minutes and to 24.8% after 1 hour of infusion, despite a 20 mm Hg increase in systolic pressure. The same dose of epinephrine given before ischemia increased segment shortening to 30.5%. In six of the dogs, postextrasystolic potentiation before ischemia increased segment shortening from 21.8 to 31.1%, and after 1 hour of recovery from ischemia, from 7.9 to 24.8%. Lesser increases in segment shortening were also seen in nonischemic segments. The results indicate that stunned myocardium possesses considerable functional reserve. Deficient energy stores are therefore not likely to be the basis for depressed function seen at rest in stunned myocardium.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanism of myocardial "stunning".
Bolli, R. (1990) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.82.3.723 · Cited by 992
Oxygen-derived free radicals and myocardial reperfusion injury: An overview
Bolli, R. (1991) · Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy · doi:10.1007/bf00054747 · Cited by 295
Consequences of Brief Ischemia: Stunning, Preconditioning, and Their Clinical Implications: Part 2
Kloner, R. A., & Jennings, R. B. (2001) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/hc5001.100039 · Cited by 286
Transgenic Mouse Model of Stunned Myocardium
Murphy, A. M., Kögler, H., Georgakopoulos, D., McDonough, J. L., Kass, D. A., Van Eyk, J. E., & Marbán, E. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5452.488 · Cited by 228
Metadata
- Authors
- Becker, L. C., Levine, J. H., DiPaula, A. F., Guarnieri, T., & Aversano, T.
- Venue
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1986-03
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 580-589
- ISSN
- 0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092094831
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reversal of dysfunction in postischemic stunned myocardium by epinephrine and postextrasystolic potentiation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80468-5
- The paper
- Becker, L. C., Levine, J. H., DiPaula, A. F., Guarnieri, T., & Aversano, T. (1986). Reversal of dysfunction in postischemic stunned myocardium by epinephrine and postextrasystolic potentiation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80468-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.