Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 240

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gender differences in molecular remodeling in pressure overload hypertrophy

Open access
Weinberg, Ellen O, Thienelt, Christiane D, Katz, Sarah E, Bartunek, Jozef, Tajima, Minori, Rohrbach, Susanne, Douglas, Pamela S, Lorell, Beverly H·1999·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine gender differences in left ventricular (LV) function and expression of cardiac genes in response to LV pressure overload due to ascending aortic stenosis in rats. BACKGROUND: Clinical studies have documented gender differences in the pattern of adaptive LV hypertrophy. Whether these differences result from intrinsic differences in molecular adaptation to pressure overload between men and women, or are related to other factors is not known. METHODS: Male (n = 8) and female (n = 8) Wistar rats underwent ascending aortic stenosis and were studied 6 weeks after banding with gender-matched control rats (male n = 7; female n = 7). The LV contractile reserve was examined in isolated hearts from each group. We compared LV messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) levels of atrial natriuretic factor (ANF), beta-myosin heavy chain, sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) and Na+-Ca2+ exchanger. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction was used to identify estrogen receptor transcript in cardiac myocytes and LV tissue. RESULTS: The magnitude of LV hypertrophy (LVH) and systolic wall stress were similar in male and female animals with LVH. Male LVH hearts demonstrated a depressed contractile reserve; in contrast, contractile reserve was preserved in female LVH hearts. The expression of beta-myosin heavy chain and ANF mRNA was greater in male versus female LVH hearts. Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase mRNA levels were depressed in male LVH but not in female LVH compared with control rats, and Na+-Ca2+ exchanger mRNA levels were increased similarly in both male and female LVH hearts. Estrogen receptor transcript was detected in both adult male and female cardiac myocytes and LV tissue. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant gender differences in the LV adaptation to pressure overload despite a similar degree of LVH and systolic wall stress in male and female rats. There is the potential for estrogen signaling through the adult myocyte estrogen receptor in both male and female rats to contribute to gender differences in gene expression in pathologic hypertrophy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00165-5

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 240

Metadata

Authors
Weinberg, E. O., Thienelt, C. D., Katz, S. E., Bartunek, J., Tajima, M., Rohrbach, S., Douglas, P. S., & Lorell, B. H.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-07
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
264-273
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044496493
Cited by
240
References
0
FWCI
6.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender differences in molecular remodeling in pressure overload hypertrophy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00165-5
The paper
Weinberg, E. O., Thienelt, C. D., Katz, S. E., Bartunek, J., Tajima, M., Rohrbach, S., Douglas, P. S., & Lorell, B. H. (1999). Gender differences in molecular remodeling in pressure overload hypertrophy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00165-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.