The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial Endophytes: Potential Role in Developing Sustainable Systems of Crop Production
Abstract
Most healthy naturally propagated plants grown in field or potting soils are colonized by communities of endophytic bacteria, embracing a wide variety of species and genera. These bacteria form nonpathogenic relationships with their hosts: some beneficial, some neutral, and some detrimental. Such associations can increase plant growth and hasten development or improve resistance to environmental stress. Endophytic bacteria have been implicated in supplying biologically fixed nitrogen in non-legumes, and these associations can increase the nitrogen economy of a crop, reducing the requirement for N fertilizers. Bacterial endophytes have also been shown to prevent disease development through endophyte-mediated de novo synthesis of structural compounds and fungitoxic metabolites. Such induced protection responses have been linked to certain forms of systemic acquired (disease) resistance. Certain crop sequences have been shown to favor the build-up of specific plant growth-promoting bacterial endophyte populations. These can lead to the creation of beneficial host-endophyte allelopa-thies, with implications for the formation and maintenance of fertile, disease-suppressive soils. Manipulating bacterial populations in soils and within crops will be crucial if endophytes are to be utilized in crop production systems, and special techniques will be required to do so. This review surveys the natural associations between bacterial endophytes and their hosts, and discusses how such relationships can be employed most productively in sustainable systems of agricultural crop production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya.
Woese, C. R., Kandler, O., & Wheelis, M. L. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576 · Cited by 6,128
Plant productivity and environment
Boyer, J. S. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.218.4571.443 · Cited by 3,959
Cited by
Compant, S., Duffy, B., Nowak, J., Clément, C., & Barka, E. A. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.9.4951-4959.2005 · Cited by 2,640
Self-citationCompant, S., Clément, C., & Sessitsch, A. (2010) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.024 · Cited by 2,318
Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review
Hayat, R., Ali, S., Amara, U., Khalid, R., & Ahmed, I. (2010) · Annals of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s13213-010-0117-1 · Cited by 2,064
Plant-rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions
DIMKPA, C., WEINAND, T., & ASCH, F. (2009) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02028.x · Cited by 963
Elbeltagy, A., Nishioka, K., Sato, T., Suzuki, H., Ye, B., Hamada, T., Isawa, T., Mitsui, H., & Minamisawa, K. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.11.5285-5293.2001 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Sturz, A. V., Christie, B. R., & Nowak, J.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-30
- ISSN
- 0735-2689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979482152
- Cited by
- 858
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial Endophytes: Potential Role in Developing Sustainable Systems of Crop Production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0735-2689(01)80001-0
- The paper
- Sturz, A. V., Christie, B. R., & Nowak, J. (2000). Bacterial Endophytes: Potential Role in Developing Sustainable Systems of Crop Production. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-2689(01)80001-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.