The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A novel two‐step method for the formation of tissue‐engineered cartilage by mature bovine chondrocytes: The alginate‐recovered‐chondrocyte (ARC) method
Abstract
Most attempts to tissue‐engineer cartilage have involved seeding of cultured cells into a biological or synthetic scaffold. We have developed a novel two‐step culture approach that makes possible the in vitro formation of cartilaginous‐like tissue by mature adult bovine chondrocytes without the aid of a synthetic matrix. The first step consists of culturing chondrocytes under conditions that maintain their rounded shape and their molecular phenotype as assessed by type II collagen and aggrecan production. This step was accomplished by culturing the isolated chondrocytes in alginate beads until the cells have reestablished a proteoglycan‐rich cell‐associated matrix (CM). The second step consists of culturing the cells with their CM, after recovery from the beads, on a tissue culture insert with a porous membrane. In this study, young adult bovine articular chondrocytes were cultured in alginate beads in the presence of 10% or 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS). After 7 days of culture, the alginate beads were dissolved by incubating the beads for 20 min in sodium citrate buffer, a calcium chelator. Following a brief centrifugation, the cells with their CM were recovered, resuspended in medium containing 10% or 20% FBS and seeded onto a tissue culture insert. After 1 week of culture on the insert, the individual cells with their CM progressively became incorporated into a mass of cartilaginous tissue. Culture with 20% FBS resulted in the best formation of tissues. These tissues, easily recovered from the insert, were then subjected to biochemical and histological analyses. The biochemical results showed that the chondrocytes remain phenotypically stable in the tissues. The de novo tissue has a relatively high ratio of PG/collagen. Histological examination of the tissue revealed it contained a cartilage‐like matrix strongly stained with toluidine blue. This scaffold‐free system appears ideal to study, in vitro, the development of transplantable cartilaginous tissue. © 2002 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The role of metabolism in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis
Mobasheri, A., Rayman, M. P., Gualillo, O., Sellam, J., van der Kraan, P., & Fearon, U. (2017) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2017.50 · Cited by 742
Biocompatibility of a Marine Collagen-Based Scaffold In Vitro and In Vivo
Benayahu, D., Pomeraniec, L., Shemesh, S., Heller, S., Rosenthal, Y., Rath-Wolfson, L., & Benayahu, Y. (2020) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md18080420 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Masuda, K., Sah, R. L., Hejna, M. J., & Thonar, E. J. ‐. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-148
- ISSN
- 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1554-527X
- OpenAlex
- W1996584907
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A novel two‐step method for the formation of tissue‐engineered cartilage by mature bovine chondrocytes: The alginate‐recovered‐chondrocyte (ARC) method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0736-0266(02)00109-2
- The paper
- Masuda, K., Sah, R. L., Hejna, M. J., & Thonar, E. J. ‐. A. (2003). A novel two‐step method for the formation of tissue‐engineered cartilage by mature bovine chondrocytes: The alginate‐recovered‐chondrocyte (ARC) method. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0736-0266(02)00109-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.