The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alliances, External Technology Acquisition, and Discontinuous Technological Change
Abstract
A new paradigm, a radical innovation, the next killer application–the terms differ, but they all point to the same thing: a major change in the technology base for a mature industry. A discontinuous technological change (DTC) poses a significant challenge for the companies operating in the affected industry. The technology at the foundation of their products and markets has changed, and they must find a way to adapt to that change. To maintain their competitive standing, they must master the new technology and ensure that their products and processes fully exploit it. Noting that alliances offer an increasingly popular means for meeting the challenges that a DTC presents, C. Jay Lambe and Robert E. Spekman explore two issues related to alliances and DTC. First, why does DTC motivate companies to use alliances as a means for acquiring technology? And second, how do these motivations change during the various stages of the DTC life-cycle? By understanding the relationship between DTC and technology sourcing alliances, a firm can increase the likelihood of success for its alliances and thus improve the effectiveness of its product development efforts. When faced with a DTC, an established firm has three options for obtaining the new technology: merging with or acquiring a company that already possesses the technology; developing the required capabilities by using existing resources; or entering into some form of alliance. Because of time-to-market pressures and industry uncertainty, alliances often take precedence over the other two options for acquiring the new technology. However, the attractiveness of alliances also varies as a result of changes in the levels of urgency and uncertainty throughout the DTC life-cycle. The advent of a radical innovation is marked by a relatively low sense of urgency and high levels of industry uncertainty. Firms are not yet certain how the new technology will affect the industry, and they may not feel compelled to enter into technology sourcing alliances. As the new technology takes hold–and the levels of urgency and uncertainty peak–the motivation for entering into a technology sourcing alliance also reaches its highest level. Firms must move quickly to secure a position of market leadership, and the right alliance can jump-start those efforts. During the latter stages in the DTC life-cycle, the technology and the market requirements become more stable, the levels of urgency and industry uncertainty decrease, and firms often shift their focus from alliances to internal development and acquisitions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Core Competence of the Corporation
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (2006) · Strategische Unternehmungsplanung — Strategische Unternehmungsführung · doi:10.1007/3-540-30763-x_14 · Cited by 11,433
Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments
Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392832 · Cited by 6,112
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 5,747
Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives
Kogut, B. (1988) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250090403 · Cited by 3,333
Patterns of Industrial Innovation
Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978) · Technology Review · Cited by 3,331
Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation
Utterback, J. M. (1996) · Cited by 2,483
Collaborate with your competitors and win
Hamel, G. (1989) · Harvard business review · Cited by 2,104
Innovation: The Attacker's Advantage
Otto, E. R., & Foster, R. (1987) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258527 · Cited by 1,021
Joint ventures and competitive strategy
Harrigan, K. R. (1988) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250090205 · Cited by 927
The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance
Hagedoorn, J., & Schakenraad, J. (1994) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250150404 · Cited by 924
Cited by
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310385696 · Cited by 939
Accessing information sharing and information quality in supply chain management
Li, S., & Lin, B. (2006) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.02.011 · Cited by 849
Corporate foresight: Its three roles in enhancing the innovation capacity of a firm
Rohrbeck, R., & Gemünden, H. G. (2011) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.019 · Cited by 321
Choosing governance modes for external technology sourcing
van de Vrande, V., Lemmens, C., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2006) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00434.x · Cited by 294
Tyler, B. B., & Steensma, H. K. (1998) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199810)19:10<939::aid-smj978>3.0.co;2-z · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Lambe, C. J., & Spekman, R. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Product Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-03-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 102-116
- ISSN
- 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142921274
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 20.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alliances, External Technology Acquisition, and Discontinuous Technological Change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0737-6782(96)00077-x
- The paper
- Lambe, C. J., & Spekman, R. E. (1997). Alliances, External Technology Acquisition, and Discontinuous Technological Change. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0737-6782(96)00077-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.