The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An expert system intervention for smoking cessation
Open accessAbstract
Intervention efficacy can be increased when the treatment is maximally matched to the needs of the client. One means of achieving such matching is through use of an expert system, a computer-based decision-making system designed to utilize client information to produce unique, matched information and interventions. An expert system can combine the individual matching possible in a clinic-based intervention and the low cost associated with a public health approach. This paper begins by discussing several alternative implementations of the expert system approach within the general context of communication theory. Second, the theoretical model and related empirical evidence which form the basis of the expert system is described briefly. Third, the details of a computer-driven, expert system intervention specifically developed for smoking cessation is described. Finally, empirical results from a study comparing the expert system intervention to three alternative interventions for smoking cessation are presented. In general, the expert system approach can provide a cost effective, viable, and efficacious means of intervening in a specific problem behavior area. Implications and potential areas of development are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change.
Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.51.3.390 · Cited by 9,098
Self-citationIn search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors.
Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.47.9.1102 · Cited by 8,596
Self-citationThe Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change.
Prochaska, J. O., & Velicer, W. F. (1997) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38 · Cited by 7,782
Self-citation
Cited by
Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships
Bickmore, T. W., & Picard, R. W. (2005) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/1067860.1067867 · Cited by 1,333
A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change
Krebs, P., Prochaska, J. O., & Rossi, J. S. (2010) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.004 · Cited by 854
Self-citationSmoking and the Five‐Factor Model of personality
Terracciano, A., & Costa, P. T. (2004) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00687.x · Cited by 422
Us Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guideline: Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence
Fiore, M. C., & Staff, G. P. A. (2000) · Respiratory Care · doi:10.1177/002013240004501007 · Cited by 346
Health dialog systems for patients and consumers
Bickmore, T., & Giorgino, T. (2006) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2005.12.004 · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Authors
- Velicer, W. F., & Prochaska, J. O.
- Venue
- Patient Education and Counseling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-129
- ISSN
- 0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4248934991
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An expert system intervention for smoking cessation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00129-3
- The paper
- Velicer, W. F., & Prochaska, J. O. (1999). An expert system intervention for smoking cessation. Patient Education and Counseling. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00129-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.