Evaluation of Communication Training Programs in Nursing Care: A Review of the Literature
Open accessAbstract
An important aspect of nursing care is communication with patients. Nurses' major communication tasks are not only to inform the patient about his/her disease and treatment, but also to create a therapeutically effective relationship by assessing patients' concerns, showing understanding, empathy, and providing comfort and support. In this review, 14 studies, which focus on the evaluation of the effects of communication training programs for nurses, have been evaluated. The selected studies were screened on several independent, process and outcome variables as described by Francke et al. [8]. In this way not only is the training program taken into account as a variable which may be responsible for nurses' behavioural change and for changes in patient outcomes, but also a range of other variables which can give more nuanced explanations for a training program's degree of effectiveness. On the whole, the studies reviewed showed limited or no effects on nurses' skills, on nurses' behavioural changes in practice, and on patient outcomes. Finally, the majority of the studies had a weak design. The use of experimental research designs should be pursued in future studies in order to eliminate the influence of confounding variables.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Training programs involving communication theory classes and self-assessment tools have had convincingly positive results.
“Training programs involving, for example, communication theory classes (Kruijver et al. 2000) and self-assessment tools that can be used in specific situations (Curtis et al. 2013; Rider and Keefer 2006) have had convincingly positive results.”
From Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education (2023) · cites this paper as Kruijver et al. 2000
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 174
- Authors
- Kruijver, I. P. M., Kerkstra, A., Francke, A. L., Bensing, J. M., & van de Wiel, H. B. M.
- Affiliations
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Kruijver, Irma P.M
- ORCID
- Francke, Anneke L
- Venue
- Patient Education and Counseling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-145
- ISSN
- 0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2113240784
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 3.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.nivel.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
- Keywords
- nurse-patient communication, communication training program, nursing education, patient outcomes, empathy, therapeutic relationship, training program effectiveness, experimental design
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Competence, Communication, Education, Nursing, Continuing, Humans, Inservice Training, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Nurse-Patient Relations, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Research Design, Nursing Evaluation Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review