Cited by 174Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesEmpathy and Medical Education

Evaluation of Communication Training Programs in Nursing Care: A Review of the Literature

Open access
Kruijver, Irma P.M, Kerkstra, Ada, Francke, Anneke L, Bensing, Jozien M, van de Wiel, Harry B.M·2000·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

An important aspect of nursing care is communication with patients. Nurses' major communication tasks are not only to inform the patient about his/her disease and treatment, but also to create a therapeutically effective relationship by assessing patients' concerns, showing understanding, empathy, and providing comfort and support. In this review, 14 studies, which focus on the evaluation of the effects of communication training programs for nurses, have been evaluated. The selected studies were screened on several independent, process and outcome variables as described by Francke et al. [8]. In this way not only is the training program taken into account as a variable which may be responsible for nurses' behavioural change and for changes in patient outcomes, but also a range of other variables which can give more nuanced explanations for a training program's degree of effectiveness. On the whole, the studies reviewed showed limited or no effects on nurses' skills, on nurses' behavioural changes in practice, and on patient outcomes. Finally, the majority of the studies had a weak design. The use of experimental research designs should be pursued in future studies in order to eliminate the influence of confounding variables.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0738-3991(99)00096-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 174

Authors
Kruijver, I. P. M., Kerkstra, A., Francke, A. L., Bensing, J. M., & van de Wiel, H. B. M.
Affiliations
  • Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Kruijver, Irma P.M
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-01
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
129-145
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113240784
Cited by
174
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
nurse-patient communication, communication training program, nursing education, patient outcomes, empathy, therapeutic relationship, training program effectiveness, experimental design
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Communication, Education, Nursing, Continuing, Humans, Inservice Training, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Nurse-Patient Relations, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Research Design, Nursing Evaluation Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review