The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
E-government adoption: Architecture and barriers
Ebrahim, Z., & Irani, Z. (2005) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/14637150510619902 · Cited by 755
e-Government Adoption Model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels
Shareef, M. A., Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.006 · Cited by 581
Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services
Lindgren, I., Madsen, C. Ø., Hofmann, S., & Melin, U. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.002 · Cited by 517
Big data in the policy cycle: Policy decision making in the digital era
Höchtl, J., Parycek, P., & Schöllhammer, R. (2016) · Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10919392.2015.1125187 · Cited by 331
“There is a growing consensus in the literature that the use of ICT is a necessity for countries that aim to improve their overall performance (Gupta and Jana 2003; Layne and Lee 2001).”
BackgroundWhy e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website
Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. G., Giannakidou, I., & Mavridis, N. (2016) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.003 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Layne, K., & Lee, J.
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 122-136
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160196038
- Cited by
- 2,645
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 133.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0740-624x(01)00066-1
- The paper
- Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0740-624x(01)00066-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
