Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model

Layne, Karen, Lee, Jungwoo·2001·Government Information Quarterly

DOI 10.1016/s0740-624x(01)00066-1

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0740-624x(01)00066-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

E-government adoption: Architecture and barriers
Ebrahim, Z., & Irani, Z. (2005) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/14637150510619902 · Cited by 755
e-Government Adoption Model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels
Shareef, M. A., Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.006 · Cited by 581
Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services
Lindgren, I., Madsen, C. Ø., Hofmann, S., & Melin, U. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.002 · Cited by 517
Big data in the policy cycle: Policy decision making in the digital era
Höchtl, J., Parycek, P., & Schöllhammer, R. (2016) · Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10919392.2015.1125187 · Cited by 331
“There is a growing consensus in the literature that the use of ICT is a necessity for countries that aim to improve their overall performance (Gupta and Jana 2003; Layne and Lee 2001).”
Background
Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website
Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. G., Giannakidou, I., & Mavridis, N. (2016) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.003 · Cited by 325
Understanding the evolution of e-government: The influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics
Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Martinez-Moyano, I. J. (2007) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.04.005 · Cited by 288
Transformational change and business process reengineering (BPR): Lessons from the British and Dutch public sector
Weerakkody, V., Janssen, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.010 · Cited by 262
Value positions viewed through the lens of automated decision-making: The case of social services
Ranerup, A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.004 · Cited by 169
E-government and organisational transformation of government: Black box revisited?
Nograšek, J., & Vintar, M. (2014) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.07.006 · Cited by 164
Moving from E-Government to T-Government: A Study of Process Reengineering Challenges in a UK Local Authority Context
Weerakkody, V., & Dhillon, G. (2008) · International Journal of Electronic Government Research · doi:10.4018/jegr.2008100101 · Cited by 160
Determinants of service quality and continuance intention of online services: The case of eTax
Hu, P. J., Brown, S. A., Thong, J. Y. L., Chan, F. K. Y., & Tam, K. Y. (2009) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20956 · Cited by 139
A longitudinal study of e-government maturity
Das, A., Singh, H., & Joseph, D. (2017) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.09.006 · Cited by 129
Determinants of master data management adoption by local government organizations: An empirical study
Haneem, F., Kama, N., Taskin, N., Pauleen, D., & Abu Bakar, N. A. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.007 · Cited by 121
Electronic government as a paradigm shift for efficient public services: Opportunities and challenges for Nigerian government
Asogwa, B. E. (2013) · Library Hi Tech · doi:10.1108/07378831311303985 · Cited by 120
Suing the algorithm: the mundanization of automated decision-making in public services through litigation
Kaun, A. (2022) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2021.1924827 · Cited by 97
Digital citizen empowerment: a systematic literature review of theories and development models
Sharma, S., Kar, A. K., Gupta, M. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Janssen, M. (2022) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2022.2046533 · Cited by 90
Digital Commons and Citizen Coproduction in Smart Cities: Assessment of Brazilian Municipal E-Government Platforms
Rotta, M. J. R., Sell, D., dos Santos Pacheco, R. C., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2019) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en12142813 · Cited by 89
The periphery on stage: The intra-organizational dynamics in online communities of creation
Rullani, F., & Haefliger, S. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.008 · Cited by 79
Barriers and impediments to transformational government: Insights from literature and practice
Veenstra, A. F. V., Klievink, B., & Janssen, M. (2011) · Electronic Government, an International Journal · doi:10.1504/eg.2011.039838 · Cited by 72
Implementing e-government in Sri Lanka: Lessons from the UK
Weerakkody, V., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Kurunananda, A. (2009) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1002/itdj.20122 · Cited by 68
Assessing electronic service delivery in municipalities: Determinants and financial consequences of e-government implementation
Budding, T., Faber, B., & Gradus, R. (2018) · Local Government Studies · doi:10.1080/03003930.2018.1473768 · Cited by 64
An e-government framework for assessing readiness for public sector e-procurement in a lower-middle income country
Adjei-Bamfo, P., Domfeh, K. A., Bawole, J. N., Ahenkan, A., Maloreh-Nyamekye, T., Adjei-Bamfo, S., & Darkwah, S. A. (2020) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2020.1769542 · Cited by 63
Does E-Government Raise Effectiveness and Efficiency?: Examining the Cross-National Effect
Nam, T. (2019) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.2019070107 · Cited by 53
Characterization of e-Government adoption in Europe
Yera, A., Arbelaitz, O., Jauregui, O., & Muguerza, J. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231585 · Cited by 52
Automating the Public Sector and Organizing Accountabilities
Smith, M. L., Noorman, M. E., & Martin, A. K. (2010) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.02601 · Cited by 51
Studying Transformational Government: A review of the existing methodological approaches and future outlook
Omar, A., Weerakkody, V., & Daowd, A. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101458 · Cited by 51
Culture and Conflict Management Style of International Project Managers
Mohammed, U. K., White, G. R., & Prabhakar, G. P. (2009) · International Journal of Business and Management · doi:10.5539/ijbm.v3n5p3 · Cited by 41
The Virtual and the Real in Planning and Urban Design: Perspectives, Practices and Applications
(2017) · doi:10.4324/9781315270241 · Cited by 35
Untitled work
(2006) · Cited by 34
Assessing citizens’ non-adoption of public e-services in Germany
Distel, B. (2020) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-190214 · Cited by 23
E-Government Information Systems (IS) Project Failure in Developing Countries: Lessons from the Literature
Nyansiro, J. B., Mtebe, J. S., & Kissaka, M. M. (2021) · The African Journal of Information and Communication (AJIC) · doi:10.23962/10539/32210 · Cited by 23
Human resource capacity and adoption of e-government for improved service delivery in Kajiado County, Kenya
Wairiuko, J. W., Nyonje, D. R., & Omulo, D. E. O. (2018) · International Journal of Business and Social Science · doi:10.30845/ijbss.v9n10p10 · Cited by 18
Adopting and Refining e-services—The Role of Organization Size
Jacobsen, D. I. (2018) · Public Organization Review · doi:10.1007/s11115-016-0364-0 · Cited by 18
A Transparency Maturity Model for Government Software Tenders
Hochstetter, J., Vairetti, C., Cares, C., Ojeda, M. G., & Maldonado, S. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3067217 · Cited by 16
ICT and Tax Administration in Sub-Saharan Africa: Adopting ITAS in Uganda and Sierra Leone
Occhiali, G., Akol, D., & Kargbo, P. M. (2022) · doi:10.19088/ictd.2022.014 · Cited by 10

Authors: Layne, K., & Lee, J.
Venue: Government Information Quarterly
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2001-06
Volume: 18
Issue: 2
Pages: 122-136
ISSN: 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/s0740-624x(01)00066-1
OpenAlex: W2160196038
Cited by: 2,645
References: 0
FWCI: 133.42
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review