The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MENTORING RESEARCH: A REVIEW AND DYNAMIC PROCESS MODEL
Abstract
Organizations have become increasingly interested in developing their human resources. One tool that has been explored in this quest is mentoring. This has led to a surge in mentoring research and an increase in the number of formal mentoring programs implemented in organizations. This review provides a survey of the empirical work on mentoring that is organized around the major questions that have been investigated. Then a conceptual model, focused on formal mentoring relationships, is developed to help understand the mentoring process. The model draws upon research from a diverse body of literature, including interpersonal relationships, career success, training and development, and informal mentoring. Finally, a discussion of critical next steps for research in the mentoring domain is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705 · Cited by 7,766
Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.96.3.465 · Cited by 4,636
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.124.2.262 · Cited by 4,180
Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678 · Cited by 2,126 · cited 1×
“A wealth of research in work, educational, and training contexts supports the notion that goals are motivational in nature, showing individuals who develop challenging and concrete goals exert more effort (Kanfer, 1990; Locke & Latham, 2002) and that more motivated individuals learn more and acquire more knowledge and…”
BackgroundKraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.311 · Cited by 1,831
Ensher, E. A., Thomas, C., & Murphy, S. E. (2001) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1007870600459 · Cited by 308
Cited by
Eby, L. T., Allen, T. D., Evans, S. C., Ng, T., & DuBois, D. L. (2008) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.005 · Cited by 1,046
Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences Can Make Scientific Research More Inclusive
Bangera, G., & Brownell, S. E. (2014) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.14-06-0099 · Cited by 722
Eby, L. T. D. T., Allen, T. D., Hoffman, B. J., Baranik, L. E., Sauer, J. B., Baldwin, S., Morrison, M. A., Kinkade, K. M., Maher, C. P., Curtis, S., et al. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0029279 · Cited by 604
Dolan, E., & Johnson, D. (2009) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-009-9165-3 · Cited by 197
Understanding mentoring relationships in China: Towards a Confucian model
Zhou, A. J., Lapointe, É., & Zhou, S. S. (2019) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-018-9589-5 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Wanberg, C. R., Welsh, E. T., & Hezlett, S. A.
- Venue
- Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management
- Publisher
- Emerald (MCB UP )
- Published
- 2004-05-19
- Pages
- 39-124
- ISSN
- 0742-7301 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2481040508
- Cited by
- 624
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 49.31
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MENTORING RESEARCH: A REVIEW AND DYNAMIC PROCESS MODEL. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0742-7301(03)22002-8
- The paper
- Wanberg, C. R., Welsh, E. T., & Hezlett, S. A. (2004). MENTORING RESEARCH: A REVIEW AND DYNAMIC PROCESS MODEL. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-7301(03)22002-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
