Cited by 2,126Human Resource Development and Performance EvaluationEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessAdult and Continuing Education Topics

Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research.

Colquitt, Jason A., LePine, Jeffrey A., Noe, Raymond A.·2000·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

This article meta-analytically summarizes the literature on training motivation, its antecedents, and its relationships with training outcomes such as declarative knowledge, skill acquisition, and transfer. Significant predictors of training motivation and outcomes included individual characteristics (e.g., locus of control, conscientiousness, anxiety, age, cognitive ability, self-efficacy, valence, job involvement) and situational characteristics (e.g., climate). Moreover, training motivation explained incremental variance in training outcomes beyond the effects of cognitive ability. Meta-analytic path analyses further showed that the effects of personality, climate, and age on training outcomes were only partially mediated by self-efficacy, valence, and job involvement. These findings are discussed in terms of their practical significance and their implications for an integrative theory of training motivation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For adolescents and adults, academic motivation accounts for approximately 30% of learning, as well as the transfer and/or application of what has been learned.

    “In fact, conservative estimates posit that for adolescents and adults, academic motivation accounts for approximately 30% of learning, as well as the transfer and/or application of what has been learned (Colquitt, LePine, & Noe, 2000).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2000
Volume
85
Issue
5
Pages
678-707
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W2128070591
Cited by
2,126
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 127 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 139 · 2014: 132 · 2013: 136 · 2012: 115
FWCI
29.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
Keywords
training motivation, self-efficacy, valence, job involvement, locus of control, conscientiousness, anxiety, cognitive ability, organizational climate, skill acquisition, knowledge transfer, mediating effect, integrative theory, adult learning
MeSH terms
Humans, Inservice Training, Motivation, Psychological Theory, Psychology, Industrial, Regression Analysis, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review