Cited by 80Women's cancer prevention and managementCancer survivorship and careBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

A comparative study of post-operative psychosocial function in women with primary operable breast cancer randomized to breast conservation therapy or mastectomy

Poulsen, B., Graversen, H.P., Beckmann, J., Blichert-Toft, M.·1997·European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO)

Abstract

In a randomized patient series of 184 women suffering from primary operable breast carcinoma, psychosocial adjustment to breast-conserving therapy (BCT) vs mastectomy (M) was analysed retrospectively, including: (i) a comparison of intergroup characteristics; (ii) patient experience of the quality of professional pre-operative information; and (iii) the extent to which influence on choice of treatment was required. Using LASA (Linear Analogue Self-Assessment Scale), STAI (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), and a semi-structured interview, no psychosocial benefits were found in BCT compared with M. Mean observation time was 31 months (range: 15-65). Body image was less impaired in BCT than in M. Both groups scored highly on professional information, but reported reduced ability to take in such information in the peri-operative period. Both groups tended to depend on the surgeon when choosing between surgical options. Irrespective of primary therapy, women must still confront the fact that they have had cancer, a life-threatening disease which may recur. A need for further research into peri-operative information procedures was demonstrated, and some suggestions were derived concerning the surgeon's role in deciding on surgical options.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0748-7983(97)90804-0

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Danish women, mastectomy had a huge impact on social contact, quality of life, psychological balance, and overall mood but no difference in performance of day-to-day activity compared with breast-conserving therapy.

    “A comparative analysis of quality of life between post-mastectomy and breast-conserving therapies observed that mastectomy had a huge impact on making social contact, quality of life, psychological balance, and overall mood in these women but had no difference in performance of day-to-day activity. 16”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poulsen, B., Graversen, H. P., Beckmann, J., & Blichert-Toft, M.
Affiliations
Odense University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Poulsen, B.
Venue
European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO)
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-08
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
327-334
ISSN
0748-7983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095524576
Cited by
80
References
38
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Surgical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
breast cancer, breast-conserving therapy, mastectomy, psychosocial adjustment, body image, preoperative information, patient decision-making, anxiety, quality of life, postoperative outcomes
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Attitude to Health, Body Image, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Personality Inventory, Quality of Life, Sexual Behavior, Mastectomy, Modified Radical, Mastectomy, Segmental

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review