Cited by 321Microbial infections and disease researchAnimal health and immunologyAnimal Disease Management and Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Economic Impact Associated with Respiratory Disease in Beef Cattle

Griffin, Dee·1997·Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice

Abstract

The data presented consistently demonstrated the cost of BRD from weaning to the packers to be approximately 7% of the total production cost when compared to animals with health respiratory tracts. As a clinician it is distressing to feel that we cannot accurately identify all the animals that require treatment. Greater emphasis must be placed on prevention of BRD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0749-0720(15)30302-9

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bryant, 1996, Lung pathology and its economic impact, Academy of Veterinary Consultants Proceedings, 34, 67
  2. Cole, 1992, Receiving and management of stressed cattle: A review of the literature
  3. Crenshaw, 1968, Comments of control and management of disease in beef cattle, J Am Vet Med Assoc, 152, 923
  4. Griffin, 1995, Feedlot respiratory disease: Cost, value of preventatives and intervention, American Association of Bovine Practitioners Proceedings, 27, 157
  5. Smith, 1988, Management of stockers, Agri-Practice, 9, 8
  6. Thomson, 1981, The pathogenesis and lesions of pneumonia in cattle, Compendium on Continuing Education for the Practicing Veterinarian, 3, S403
  7. Wittum, 1995, Relationship between treatment for respiratory disease, the presence of pulmonary lesions at slaughter, and rate of gain in feedlot cattle, J Anim Sci, 238

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 321

Metadata

Authors
Griffin, D.
Corresponding author
Griffin, Dee
Venue
Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-11
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
367-377
ISSN
0749-0720 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W69765986
Cited by
317
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal health and immunology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Keywords
bovine respiratory disease, beef cattle, economic impact, production costs, weaning, packers, disease prevention
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Husbandry, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Lung, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Risk Factors, Models, Economic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review