The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prenatal Care Utilization: Its Measurement and Relationship to Pregnancy Outcome
Open accessAbstract
This study proposes a redesigned measure of prenatal care utilization based on modifications made to a preexisting index of the adequacy of such care. Six prenatal care utilization groups were delineated: intensive, adequate, intermediate, inadequate, no-care, and missing/unknown. Using 430,349 cases from South Carolina and North Carolina vital records from 1978 to 1982 (live birth-infant death cohort files for white resident mothers), this proposed prenatal care utilization measure was examined by maternal sociomedical risk characteristics (age-parity, marital status, education, complications of pregnancy, and previous pregnancy terminations) and by pregnancy outcomes (birth weight, gestational age, and birth weight- and gestational age-specific neonatal mortality). The intensive prenatal care group had relatively more pregnancy complications but also the most preferred pregnancy outcomes. Appreciable differences in birth weight and gestational age distributions were observed among the prenatal care categories within maternal risk status groups. Increased utilization of prenatal care was associated with higher mean birth weight and gestational age. However, after controlling for maternal risk status, an appreciable variation in birth weight- and gestational age-specific neonatal mortality was not apparent across prenatal care groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Teenage pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: a large population based retrospective cohort study.
Chen, X.-K., Wen, S. W., Fleming, N., Demissie, K., Rhoads, G. G., & Walker, M. (2007) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyl284 · Cited by 971
Mortality among Infants of Black as Compared with White College-Educated Parents
Schoendorf, K. C., Hogue, C. J. R., Kleinman, J. C., & Rowley, D. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199206043262303 · Cited by 383
The Role of Prenatal Care in Preventing Low Birth Weight
Alexander, G. R., & Korenbrot, C. C. (1995) · The Future of Children · doi:10.2307/1602510 · Cited by 307
Self-citationPartridge, S., Balayla, J., Holcroft, C., & Abenhaim, H. (2012) · American Journal of Perinatology · doi:10.1055/s-0032-1316439 · Cited by 301
Aliyu, M. H., Lynch, O., Wilson, R. E., Alio, A. P., Kristensen, S., Marty, P. J., Whiteman, V. E., & Salihu, H. M. (2011) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-010-1447-8 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Alexander, G. R., & Comely, D. A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1987-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 243-253
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W150273905
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prenatal Care Utilization: Its Measurement and Relationship to Pregnancy Outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0749-3797(18)31241-8
- The paper
- Alexander, G. R., & Comely, D. A. (1987). Prenatal Care Utilization: Its Measurement and Relationship to Pregnancy Outcome. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-3797(18)31241-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.