Cited by 383Maternal and Neonatal HealthcareInfant Development and Preterm CareHealth disparities and outcomes

Mortality among Infants of Black as Compared with White College-Educated Parents

Schoendorf, Kenneth C., Hogue, Carol J.R., Kleinman, Joel C., Rowley, Diane·1992·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Background In the United States, black infants are twice as likely to die as white infants; this difference reflects both black infants' higher rates of low birth weight and the higher mortality among black infants of normal birth weight. We studied mortality in infants born to college-educated parents in order to investigate this gap while controlling for sociodemographic variables. Methods We used the National Linked Birth and Infant Death Files for 1983 through 1985 to calculate infant mortality rates for children born to college-educated parents. The study population consisted of 865, 128 white infants and 42,230 black infants. A separate effect of birth weight was assessed by examining mortality rates before and after the exclusion of infants weighing less than 2500 g at birth (low-birth-weight infants). Results In this population, the infant mortality rate was 10.2 per 1000 live births for black infants and 5.4 per 1000 live births for white infants; the adjusted odds ratio for death among black infants was 1.82 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.64 to 2.01). The rate of low birth weight was more than twice as high among blacks (7 percent) as among whites (3 percent), although the mortality rate in this group was not higher among blacks than among whites. Black infants were three times as likely as white infants to die of causes attributable to perinatal events, including prematurity. They were no more likely to die of the sudden infant death syndrome. After the exclusi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199206043262303

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schoendorf, K. C., Hogue, C. J. R., Kleinman, J. C., & Rowley, D.
Affiliations
  • National Center for Health Statistics (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1992-06-04
Volume
326
Issue
23
Pages
1522-1526
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1965774202
Cited by
383
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
63.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
infant mortality, racial disparities, Black infants, white infants, low birth weight, perinatal mortality, preterm birth, sudden infant death syndrome, normal birth weight infants
MeSH terms
Birth Weight, Black or African American, Educational Status, Humans, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Marriage, Maternal Age, United States, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review