Cited by 7Gun Ownership and Violence ResearchHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Missouri firearm-related injury surveillance system

Van Tuinen, Mark, Crosby, Alex·1998·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Context The Missouri Department of Health collects hospital inpatient and emergency room records statewide. With mortality data, they make up a population-based surveillance system of firearm-related injuries. Much information is not captured by these data, however. Objective During a three-year project we attempted to develop a timely, representative, and sensitive surveillance system of firearms-related injuries and their circumstances. Design The surveillance system consisted of Missouri's hospital and mortality records linked to police records of firearm incidents. Setting Lack of standardization of police department data precluded a statewide surveillance system; therefore, we concentrated on the two largest urban areas, St. Louis and Kansas City. Participants Firearm-related injuries occurring during crimes in the surveillance area in 1994 were recorded. Wounds inflicted unintentionally or during suicide attempts were excluded. Main outcome measures We evaluated the system according to its simplicity, flexibility, acceptability, sensitivity, predictive value positive, representativeness, and timeliness. Results The surveillance system was neither timely nor simple. Though estimated to represent 95% of the desired cases, information about the firearms and the circumstances was relatively scant. Conclusions Police records as they now exist cannot be included in a statewide firearms surveillance system. The cost/benefit ratio does not justify even a regional surveillance system. Standardization of police records would be helpful, but some information will always be lacking unless the perpetrator is arrested.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00064-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 1989, Focus...black homicides in St. Louis, Missouri Monthly Vital Stat, 23

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Van Tuinen, M., & Crosby, A.
Affiliations
Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (US)
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-10
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
67-74
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011154096
Cited by
7
References
2
Citations by year
2022: 1
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (U17/CCU711084)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
firearm-related injuries, injury surveillance, police records, hospital records, emergency department records, data linkage, surveillance system evaluation, data standardization, Missouri, St. Louis, Kansas City
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Record Linkage, Middle Aged, Missouri, Population Surveillance, Sensitivity and Specificity, Wounds, Gunshot, Program Evaluation, Program Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review