The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Missouri firearm-related injury surveillance system
Abstract
Context The Missouri Department of Health collects hospital inpatient and emergency room records statewide. With mortality data, they make up a population-based surveillance system of firearm-related injuries. Much information is not captured by these data, however. Objective During a three-year project we attempted to develop a timely, representative, and sensitive surveillance system of firearms-related injuries and their circumstances. Design The surveillance system consisted of Missouri's hospital and mortality records linked to police records of firearm incidents. Setting Lack of standardization of police department data precluded a statewide surveillance system; therefore, we concentrated on the two largest urban areas, St. Louis and Kansas City. Participants Firearm-related injuries occurring during crimes in the surveillance area in 1994 were recorded. Wounds inflicted unintentionally or during suicide attempts were excluded. Main outcome measures We evaluated the system according to its simplicity, flexibility, acceptability, sensitivity, predictive value positive, representativeness, and timeliness. Results The surveillance system was neither timely nor simple. Though estimated to represent 95% of the desired cases, information about the firearms and the circumstances was relatively scant. Conclusions Police records as they now exist cannot be included in a statewide firearms surveillance system. The cost/benefit ratio does not justify even a regional surveillance system. Standardization of police records would be helpful, but some information will always be lacking unless the perpetrator is arrested.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems
Klaucke, D. N., Buehler, J. W., Thacker, S. B., et al. (1988) · Cited by 285
A generalization of the simple capture-recapture model with applications to epidemiological research
Wittes, J., & Sidel, V. W. (1968) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(68)90038-6 · Cited by 149
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 1989, Focus...black homicides in St. Louis, Missouri Monthly Vital Stat, 23
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Tuinen, M., & Crosby, A.
- Affiliations
- Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (US)
- ORCID
- Crosby, Alex
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 67-74
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011154096
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (U17/CCU711084)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Keywords
- firearm-related injuries, injury surveillance, police records, hospital records, emergency department records, data linkage, surveillance system evaluation, data standardization, Missouri, St. Louis, Kansas City
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Record Linkage, Middle Aged, Missouri, Population Surveillance, Sensitivity and Specificity, Wounds, Gunshot, Program Evaluation, Program Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review