Cited by 145Categorization, perception, and languageLanguage and cultural evolutionLanguage and Culture

Universality and language specificity in object naming

Malt, Barbara C., Sloman, Steven A., Gennari, Silvia P.·2003·Journal of Memory and Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0749-596x(03)00021-4

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malt, B. C., Sloman, S. A., & Gennari, S. P.
Affiliations
  • Lehigh University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Malt, Barbara C.
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-07
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
20-42
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998032198
Cited by
143
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language and Culture
Keywords
object naming, linguistic categories, language specificity, universality, containers, cross-linguistic comparison, English language, Spanish language, Chinese, stimulus characteristics, cultural history, categorization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review