The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grice, H. P. (1975) · Speech Acts · doi:10.1163/9789004368811_003 · Cited by 23,221
Referring as a collaborative process
Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(86)90010-7 · Cited by 2,401
Syntax and Semantics:" Vol. 3, "Speech Acts
Parret, H. (1977) · Tijdschrift voor Philosophie · Cited by 1,694
Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation.
Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.22.6.1482 · Cited by 1,457
Clark, E. V. (1993) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511554377 · Cited by 1,147
Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination
Garrod, S., & Anderson, A. (1987) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(87)90018-7 · Cited by 780
Understanding by addressees and overhearers
Schober, M. F., & Clark, H. H. (1989) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(89)90008-x · Cited by 690
The Principle of Contrast: A Constraint on Language Acquisition
(2014) · Mechanisms of Language Acquisition · doi:10.4324/9781315798721-7 · Cited by 664
Brown, R. (1958) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0041727 · Cited by 643
Hockett, C. F., & Brown, R. (1959) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2096177 · Cited by 612
Cited by
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x04000056 · Cited by 2,678
An integrated theory of language production and comprehension
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12001495 · Cited by 1,569
Attenuating information in spoken communication: for the speaker, or for the addressee?
Galati, A., & Brennan, S. E. (2010) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.002 · Cited by 200
An Alternative to Mapping a Word onto a Concept in Language Acquisition: Pragmatic Frames
Rohlfing, K. J., Wrede, B., Vollmer, A.-L., & Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00470 · Cited by 113
Signalling under Uncertainty: Interpretative Alignment without a Common Prior
Brochhagen, T. (2020) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axx058 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Metzing, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 201-213
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016986418
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 9.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0749-596x(03)00028-7
- The paper
- Metzing, C. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-596x(03)00028-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
