Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation.
Abstract
When people in conversation refer repeatedly to the same object, they come to use the same terms. This phenomenon, called lexical entrainment, has several possible explanations. Ahistorical accounts appeal only to the informativeness and availability of terms and to the current salience of the object's features. Historical accounts appeal in addition to the recency and frequency of past references and to partner-specific conceptualizations of the object that people achieve interactively. Evidence from 3 experiments favors a historical account and suggests that when speakers refer to an object, they are proposing a conceptualization of it, a proposal their addresses may or may not agree to. Once they do establish a shared conceptualization, a conceptual pact, they appeal to it in later references even when they could use simpler references. Over time, speakers simplify conceptual pacts and, when necessary, abandon them for new conceptualizations.
Cites (33)
- Basic objects in natural categoriesRosch, Eleanor, Mervis, Carolyn B, Gray, Wayne D, Johnson, David M, Boyes-Braem, Penny · 1976 · Cognitive Psychology
- Grounding in communication.Clark, Herbert H., Brennan, Susan E. · 1991 · Perspectives on socially shared cognition.
- Perspectives on socially shared cognition.1991 · American Psychological Association eBooks
- Referring as a collaborative processClark, Herbert H., Wilkes-Gibbs, Deanna · 1986 · Cognition
- Contributing to discourseClark, Herbert H., Schaefer, Edward F. · 1989 · Cognitive Science
- The vocabulary problem in human-system communicationFurnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., Gomez, L. M., Dumais, S. T. · 1987 · Communications of the ACM
- When Nouns Surface as VerbsClark, Eve V., Clark, Herbert H. · 1979 · Language
- Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordinationGarrod, Simon, Anderson, Anthony · 1987 · Cognition
- Understanding by addressees and overhearersSchober, Michael F, Clark, Herbert H · 1989 · Cognitive Psychology
- The Principle of Contrast: A Constraint on Language Acquisition2014 · Mechanisms of Language Acquisition
Cited by (35)
- On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜Bender, Emily M., Gebru, Timnit, McMillan-Major, Angelina, Shmitchell, Shmargaret · 2021 · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency
- Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.Pickering, Martin J., Garrod, Simon · 2004 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- An integrated theory of language production and comprehensionPickering, Martin J., Garrod, Simon · 2013 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Toward a second-person neuroscienceSchilbach, Leonhard, Timmermans, Bert, Reddy, Vasudevi, Costall, Alan, Bente, Gary, Schlicht, Tobias, Vogeley, Kai · 2013 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Structural priming: A critical review.Pickering, Martin J., Ferreira, Victor S. · 2008 · Psychological Bulletin
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.22.6.1482
- The paper
- Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.22.6.1482
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.