The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation site at the tibia on knee stability: Evaluation using a robotic testing system
Abstract
Despite its current popularity and relative success, endoscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft has not yet been perfected. Using a recently developed robotic/UFS testing system, we assessed the overall stability of porcine knees following ACL reconstruction with different sites of tibial graft fixation--proximal, central, and distal. Testing of the intact knee was performed first to determine the normal anterior-posterior (A-P) displacements and in situ forces of the ACL under 110 N of anterior tibial loading of 30 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees of knee flexion. The knee was then reconstructed with a BPTB autograft, and the distal end of the graft was fixed sequentially at three different locations in each specimen--proximal, central, distal. A-P testing was repeated for each fixation site, and the resulting knee kinematics and the in situ forces of the grafts were compared to the intact case. The site of tibial fixation was demonstrated to have a significant effect on the resulting anterior displacement and internal rotation of the tibia as well as the in situ forces of the graft. Proximal fixation produced the most stable knee (A-P displacements reduced to 120% of intact at 30 degrees and 170% at 90 degrees), becoming significantly less stable with more distal fixation. These results suggest that proximal graft fixation may provide the most acute stability of the reconstructed knee.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tendon healing in a bone tunnel. Part II
Weiler, A., Hoffmann, R. F. G., Bail, H. J., Rehm, O., & Südkamp, N. P. (2002) · Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery · doi:10.1053/jars.2002.30657 · Cited by 481
Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Corry, I. S., Webb, J. M., Clingeleffer, A. J., & Pinczewski, L. A. (1999) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/03635465990270040701 · Cited by 462
Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction?
Höher, J., Möller, H. D., & Fu, F. H. (1998) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s001670050105 · Cited by 381
Self-citationRodeo, S. A., Kawamura, S., Kim, H.-J., Dynybil, C., & Ying, L. (2006) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546506290059 · Cited by 238
Papageorgiou, C. D., Ma, C. B., Abramowitch, S. D., Clineff, T. D., & Woo, S. L.-Y. (2001) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/03635465010290051501 · Cited by 190
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ishibashi, Y., Rudy, T. W., Livesay, G. A., Stone, J. D., Fu, F. H., & Woo, S. L.-Y.
- Venue
- Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-182
- ISSN
- 0749-8063 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079126445
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation site at the tibia on knee stability: Evaluation using a robotic testing system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0749-8063(97)90152-3
- The paper
- Ishibashi, Y., Rudy, T. W., Livesay, G. A., Stone, J. D., Fu, F. H., & Woo, S. L.-Y. (1997). The effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation site at the tibia on knee stability: Evaluation using a robotic testing system. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-8063(97)90152-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.