Cited by 130Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Group identity and intergroup relations The common in-group identity model

Dovidio, John F., Gaertner, Samuel L., Kafati, Gladys·2004·Advances in Group Processes

Abstract

Discrimination is an intergroup as well as an interpersonal phenomenon and is related to fundamental processes associated with social categorization and the development of in-group favoritism. We propose in the Common In-Group Identity Model that by understanding the factors that underlie the development of these inter-group biases, these forces can be redirected to improve intergroup relations. In particular, if members of different groups are induced to recategorize themselves as a superordinate group rather than as two separate groups, intergroup prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination will be reduced through the extension of pro-in-group bias to former out-group members. Moreover, recategorization in the form of a dual identity, in which superordinate and subgroup identities are both salient, can achieve the benefits of a strong superordinate identity without requiring groups to forsake valued ethnic and racial identities. Data reported from laboratory studies, field experiments, and surveys involving a range of different types of groups offer converging evidence in support of the model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0882-6145(00)17002-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 103 · Cited by 130

Authors
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Kafati, G.
Venue
Advances in Group Processes
Published
2004-05-19
Pages
1-35
ISSN
0882-6145 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2503218297
Cited by
130
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
18.14
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in group processes (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Hong Kong
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
superordinate identity, intergroup relations, in-group favoritism, social categorization, intergroup discrimination, prejudice, stereotyping, recategorization, dual identity, ethnic identity, racial identity, outgroup members

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review