The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Negotiation in immersion teacher–student interaction
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977) · Language · doi:10.2307/413107 · Cited by 5,150
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263197001034 · Cited by 2,629 · cited 8×
“In Lyster and Ranta (1997), we identified four interactional moves that teachers use to push learners to improve the accuracy of their non-target output: In order to differentiate these interactional moves from the negotiation of meaning and its primarily conversational function, we initially…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Aston, 1986, Trouble-shooting in interaction with learners, Applied Linguistics, 7, 128, 10.1093/applin/7.2.128 · DOI
- Braidi, 1995, Reconsidering the role of interaction and input in second language acquisition, Language Learning, 45, 141, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00965.x · DOI · Paper page
- Chaudron, 1977, A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners’ errors, Language Learning, 27, 29, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00290.x · DOI
- Clark, 1995, The generation effect and the modeling of associations in memory, Memory & Cognition, 23, 442, 10.3758/BF03197245 · DOI
- de Bot, 1996, The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis, Language Learning, 46, 529, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01246.x · DOI · Paper page
- Ellis, 2001, Investigating form-focused instruction, Language Learning, 51, 1, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00013.x · DOI · Paper page
- Foster, 1998, A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning, Applied Linguistics, 19, 1, 10.1093/applin/19.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
- Kleifgen, 1992, Achieving coherence in multilingual interaction, Discourse Processes, 15, 183, 10.1080/01638539209544808 · DOI
- Lepper, 1990, Self-perception and social-perception processes in tutoring, Vol. 6
- Lightbown, 1990, Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communication language teaching, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429, 10.1017/S0272263100009517 · DOI
- Lyster, 1998, Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51, 10.1017/S027226319800103X · DOI · Paper page
- Lyster, 1998, Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms, Language Learning, 48, 183, 10.1111/1467-9922.00039 · DOI
- Mackey, 1998, Recasts, interaction and interlanguage development, The Modern Language Journal, 82, 338, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x · DOI
- McHoul, 1990, The organization of repair in classroom talk, Language in Society, 19, 349, 10.1017/S004740450001455X · DOI
- Nobuyoshi, 1993, Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition, ELT Journal, 47, 203, 10.1093/elt/47.3.203 · DOI
- Panova, 2002, Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom, TESOL Quarterly, 36, 573, 10.2307/3588241 · DOI
- Pica, 1994, Research on negotiation, Language Learning, 44, 493, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01115.x · DOI · Paper page
- Pica, 1989, Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63, 10.1017/S027226310000783X · DOI
- Pica, 1996, Language learners’ interaction, TESOL Quarterly, 30, 59, 10.2307/3587607 · DOI · Paper page
- Pica, 1987, The impact of interaction on comprehension, TESOL Quarterly, 21, 737, 10.2307/3586992 · DOI · Paper page
- Spada, 1993, Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 205, 10.1017/S0272263100011967 · DOI
- Swain, 1995, Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate, Applied Linguistics, 16, 370, 10.1093/applin/16.3.371 · DOI · Paper page
- Truscott, 1999, What's wrong with oral grammar correction, The Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 437, 10.3138/cmlr.55.4.437 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ORAL FEEDBACK IN CLASSROOM SLA: A Meta-Analysis
Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109990520 · Cited by 838
Self-citationINTERACTIONAL FEEDBACK AND INSTRUCTIONAL COUNTERBALANCE
Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263106060128 · Cited by 506
Self-citationResearch on form-focused instruction in immersion classrooms: implications for theory and practice
LYSTER, R. (2004) · Journal of French Language Studies · doi:10.1017/s0959269504001826 · Cited by 111
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyster, R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 237-253
- ISSN
- 0883-0355
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review