The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Cited by
The Entrepreneurial Propensity of Women
Langowitz, N., & Minniti, M. (2007) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00177.x · Cited by 1,098
Rauch, A., & Hulsink, W. (2015) · Academy of Management Learning & Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2012.0293 · Cited by 781
Neumeyer, X., & Santos, S. C. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.216 · Cited by 299
Who is left out: exploring social boundaries in entrepreneurial ecosystems
Neumeyer, X., Santos, S. C., & Morris, M. H. (2019) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-018-9694-0 · Cited by 191
Metadata
- Authors
- Jack, S. L., & Anderson, A. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Venturing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 467-487
- ISSN
- 0883-9026 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034230396
- Cited by
- 1,488
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
