The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Power vector analysis of the optical outcome of refractive surgery
Abstract
PURPOSE: To demonstrate the power vector method of representing and analyzing spherocylindrical refractive errors. SETTING: School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA. METHODS: Manifest and keratometric refractive errors were expressed as power vectors suitable for plotting as points in a 3-dimensional dioptric space. The 3 Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) of each power vector correspond to the powers of 3 lenses that, in combination, fulfill a refractive prescription: a spherical lens of power M, a Jackson crossed cylinder of power J0 with axes at 90 degrees and 180 degrees, and a Jackson crossed cylinder of power J45 with axes at 45 degrees and 135 degrees. The Pythagorean length of the power vector, B, is a measure of overall blurring strength of a spherocylindrical lens or refractive error. Changes in refractive error due to surgery were computed by the ordinary rules of vector subtraction. RESULTS: Frequency distributions of blur strength (B) clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of refractive surgery in reducing the overall blurring effect of uncorrected refractive error. CONCLUSIONS: Power vector analysis also revealed a reduction in the astigmatic component of these refractive errors. Paired comparisons revealed that the change in manifest astigmatism due to surgery was well correlated with the change in keratometric astigmatism. Power vectors aid the visualization of complex changes in refractive error by tracing a trajectory in a uniform dioptric space. The Cartesian components of a power vector are mutually independent, which simplifies mathematical and statistical analysis of refractive errors. Power vectors also provide a natural link to a more comprehensive optical description of ocular refractive imperfections in terms of wavefront aberration functions and their description by Zernike polynomials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis
Muirhead, R. J., & Anderson, T. W. (1986) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.2307/1391399 · Cited by 9,082
Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light
Born, M., Wolf, E., & Hecht, E. (2000) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.1325200 · Cited by 4,078
Statistics of Directional Data.
Gokhale, D. V., & Mardia, K. V. (1973) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529189 · Cited by 2,442
Statistics of Directional Data
(1972) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-07425-7 · Cited by 1,637
Thibos, L. N., WHEELER, W., & Horner, D. G. (1997) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1002/j.1538-9235.1997.tb04707.x · Cited by 1,238
Self-citationSpherocylindrical Refractive Errors and Visual Acuity
Raasch, T. W. (1995) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1002/j.1538-9235.1995.tb03860.x · Cited by 129
ON THE USE OF MATRICES FOR THE MEAN VALUE OF REFRACTIVE ERRORS
Keating, M. P. (1983) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.1983.tb00599.x · Cited by 49
Cited by
Optical performance of progressive addition lenses (PALs) with astigmatic prescription
De Lestrange-Anginieur, E., & Kee, C. S. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-82697-0 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Thibos, L. N., & Horner, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80-85
- ISSN
- 0146-2776 (ISSN-L)
- 0886-3350
- OpenAlex
- W2093577560
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power vector analysis of the optical outcome of refractive surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00797-5
- The paper
- Thibos, L. N., & Horner, D. (2001). Power vector analysis of the optical outcome of refractive surgery. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00797-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.