Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Clinical results of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis 3 months after surgery

Mrochen, Michael, Kaemmerer, Maik, Seiler, Theo·2001·Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the visual and refractive outcome of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct myopic astigmatism. SETTING: Departments of Ophthalmology of the Universities of Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. METHODS: This prospective study comprised 35 eyes of 28 patients who had a mean preoperative spherical refraction of -4.8 diopters (D) +/- 2.3 (SD) and a cylinder of -1.1 +/- 0.9 D. Preoperative and postoperative wavefront analysis was performed with a Tscherning aberrometer. A scanning-spot laser with a 1.0 mm spot size and a 200 Hz repetition rate was used. The eye-tracking system had a response time of less than 6 milliseconds. The treatment area diameter ranged from 6.0 to 7.0 mm with a transition zone of 1.0 mm. RESULTS: At 3 months, 68.0% of the eyes were within +/-0.5 D of emmetropia and 93.5% were within +/-1.0 D. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 93.5% of eyes. No eye lost more than 1 line of low-contrast, glare, and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA). Supernormal vision (BSCVA of 20/10 or better) was achieved in 16.0% of eyes. The correction of higher-order aberrations (spherical aberration, coma) was insufficient, with an increase factor of the overall root-mean-square wavefront error of 1.44 +/- 0.74. Coma was better corrected than spherical aberration. CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront-guided LASIK is a promising technique that offers the potential to correct refractive errors, to improve visual acuity, and to increase the quality of vision, especially under mesopic conditions. Studies that include selective overcorrection of different Zernike components are needed to achieve better correction of the aberrations. Prospective controlled clinical studies must clarify the major benefits of wavefront-guided LASIK.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00827-0

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 238

Metadata

Authors
Mrochen, M., Kaemmerer, M., & Seiler, T.
Venue
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
Published
2001-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
201-207
ISSN
  • 0146-2776 (ISSN-L)
  • 0886-3350
OpenAlex
W2115922642
Cited by
238
References
0
FWCI
15.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical results of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis 3 months after surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00827-0
The paper
Mrochen, M., Kaemmerer, M., & Seiler, T. (2001). Clinical results of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis 3 months after surgery. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00827-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.