The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate how pairs of Zernike modes interact to increase or decrease visual acuity. SETTING: Visual Optics Institute, College of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA. METHODS: Subjects read aberrated and unaberrated visual acuity charts 3 times. Each aberrated chart was produced by convolving an aberrated point-spread function with an unaberrated acuity chart. Point-spread functions were defined by 4 pairs of Zernike modes. For each pair, 9 combinations were used, ranging from all aberration being loaded into the first mode to all aberration being loaded into the second mode. The root mean square (RMS) wavefront error always totaled 0.25 microm (6.0 mm pupil), a level similar to the aberration induced by traditional flying small-spot laser refractive surgeries. RESULTS: For all conditions (except the unaberrated charts), visual acuity decreased. Acuity varied significantly depending on which modes were mixed and the relative contribution of each mode. Modes 2 radial orders apart and having the same sign and angular frequency tended to combine to increase visual acuity. Modes within the same radial order tended to combine to decrease acuity. CONCLUSIONS: For low levels of aberration, the RMS wavefront error is not a good predictor of visual acuity. Clinically, it is important to define how aberrations interact to optimize visual performance. New metrics of optical/neural performance that correlate better with clinical measures of visual performance need to be adopted or developed, as well as new clinically viable measures of visual performance that are sensitive to subtle changes in optical performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The arrangement of the three cone classes in the living human eye
Roorda, A., & Williams, D. R. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/17383 · Cited by 982
Standards for Reporting the Optical Aberrations of Eyes
Thibos, L. N., Applegate, R. A., Schwiegerling, J. T., Webb, R., & Members, V. S. T. (2000) · Vision Science and its Applications · doi:10.1364/vsia.2000.suc1 · Cited by 824
Self-citationThe luminous efficiency of rays entering the eye pupil at different points
Stiles, W. S., & Crawford, B. H. (1933) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character · doi:10.1098/rspb.1933.0020 · Cited by 689
Thibos, L. N., Hong, X., Bradley, A., & Cheng, X. (2002) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.19.002329 · Cited by 622
Clinical grading and the effects of scaling.
Bailey, I. L., Bullimore, M. A., Raasch, T. W., & Taylor, H. R. (1991) · PubMed · Cited by 505
Mrochen, M., Kaemmerer, M., Mierdel, P., & Seiler, T. (2001) · Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00806-3 · Cited by 280
Theory and measurement of ocular chromatic aberration
Thibos, L. N., Bradley, A., Still, D. L., Zhang, X., & Howarth, P. A. (1990) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(90)90126-6 · Cited by 257
Corneal First Surface Optical Aberrations and Visual Performance
Applegate, R. A., Hilmantel, G., Howland, H. C., Tu, E. Y., Starck, T., & Zayac, E. J. (2000) · Journal of Refractive Surgery · doi:10.3928/1081-597x-20000901-04 · Cited by 256
Self-citationClinical results of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis 3 months after surgery
Mrochen, M., Kaemmerer, M., & Seiler, T. (2001) · Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00827-0 · Cited by 238
Applegate, R. A., & Lakshminarayanan, V. (1993) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.10.001611 · Cited by 201
Self-citation
Cited by
Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance
Marsack, J. D., Thibos, L. N., & Applegate, R. A. (2004) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/4.4.8 · Cited by 341
Self-citationBenard, Y., Lopez-Gil, N., & Legras, R. (2011) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.10.003 · Cited by 101
Wavefront Ablation Profiles in Refractive Surgery: Description, Results, and Limitations
Smadja, D., Reggiani-Mello, G., Santhiago, M. R., & Krueger, R. R. (2012) · Journal of Refractive Surgery · doi:10.3928/1081597x-20120217-01 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Applegate, R. A., Marsack, J. D., Ramos, R., & Sarver, E. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1487-1495
- ISSN
- 0146-2776 (ISSN-L)
- 0886-3350
- OpenAlex
- W2142624198
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00334-1
- The paper
- Applegate, R. A., Marsack, J. D., Ramos, R., & Sarver, E. J. (2003). Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00334-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.