Cited by 127Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyMycobacterium research and diagnosisBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

A simple method for diagnosing M. tuberculosis infection in clinical samples using PCR

Sritharan, Venkataraman, Barker, Robert H.·1991·Molecular and Cellular Probes

Abstract

Species identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis remains a cumbersome process. We have developed a simple method for treating clinical samples which permits direct polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of mycobacterial target DNA without organic extraction. Samples were boiled for 30 min in TE-Triton, then were subjected to 30 cycles of amplification using primers derived from the repetitive clone pMTb4 developed by Patel and coworkers (1990; Journal of Clinical Microbiology 28, 513). Specificity of amplification was confirmed by hybridization with a specific probe labelled non-isotopically. In a model system consisting of cultured bacilli, this system routinely allows detection of a single organism in a sample. In preliminary studies examining applicability of this method to 96 clinical samples, 74 were positive by both PCR and mycobacterial culture, and eight were negative by both methods. Fourteen samples were negative by culture and positive by PCR, and none were positive by culture and negative by PCR. These results suggest that the PCR method may provide a sensitive alternative to conventional species-specific diagnostic methods, and that non-isotopic labelling can be used to detect hybridization in this assay.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0890-8508(06)80011-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PCR amplification of specific DNA sequences is a novel tool for detection of infectious organisms and has been applied to detect mycobacterial DNA sequences in several materials.

    “Recently, the amplification of specific DNA sequences by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a novel tool for the detection of different infectious organisms and has already been applied to detect mycobacterial DNA sequences in several materials (Pao et al., 1990; Plikaytis et al., 1991; Sritharan et al., 1991; Ghossein et al., 1992 ; Saboor et al., 1992; Popper et al., 1994).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sritharan, V., & Barker, R. H.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Barker, Robert H.
Venue
Molecular and Cellular Probes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-10
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
385-395
ISSN
0890-8508 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067834899
Cited by
127
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular and Cellular Probes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Keywords
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, tuberculosis diagnosis, clinical samples, species identification, cultural comparison
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Cell Extracts, DNA, Single-Stranded, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Polyethylene Glycols, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tuberculosis, DNA Probes, Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review