A simple method for diagnosing M. tuberculosis infection in clinical samples using PCR
Abstract
Species identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis remains a cumbersome process. We have developed a simple method for treating clinical samples which permits direct polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of mycobacterial target DNA without organic extraction. Samples were boiled for 30 min in TE-Triton, then were subjected to 30 cycles of amplification using primers derived from the repetitive clone pMTb4 developed by Patel and coworkers (1990; Journal of Clinical Microbiology 28, 513). Specificity of amplification was confirmed by hybridization with a specific probe labelled non-isotopically. In a model system consisting of cultured bacilli, this system routinely allows detection of a single organism in a sample. In preliminary studies examining applicability of this method to 96 clinical samples, 74 were positive by both PCR and mycobacterial culture, and eight were negative by both methods. Fourteen samples were negative by culture and positive by PCR, and none were positive by culture and negative by PCR. These results suggest that the PCR method may provide a sensitive alternative to conventional species-specific diagnostic methods, and that non-isotopic labelling can be used to detect hybridization in this assay.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PCR amplification of specific DNA sequences is a novel tool for detection of infectious organisms and has been applied to detect mycobacterial DNA sequences in several materials.
“Recently, the amplification of specific DNA sequences by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a novel tool for the detection of different infectious organisms and has already been applied to detect mycobacterial DNA sequences in several materials (Pao et al., 1990; Plikaytis et al., 1991; Sritharan et al., 1991; Ghossein et al., 1992 ; Saboor et al., 1992; Popper et al., 1994).”
From Application of PCR from the fine needle aspirates for the diagnosis of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis. (1996) · cites this paper as Sritharan et al., 1991
Cites
Barker, R. H., Banchongaksorn, T., Courval, J. M., Suwonkerd, W., Rimwungtragoon, K., & Wirth, D. F. (1992) · The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.1992.46.416 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Detection of Mycobacterium bovis in tissues by polymerase chain reaction
Wards, B. (1995) · Veterinary Microbiology · doi:10.1016/0378-1135(94)00096-f · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Goel, M. M., Ranjan, V., Dhole, T. N., Srivastava, A. N., Mehrotra, A., Kushwaha, M. R. S., & Jain, A. (2001) · Acta Cytologica · doi:10.1159/000327627 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Kim, S. S., Chung, S. M., Kim, J. N., Lee, M. A., & Ha, E. H. (1996) · Journal of Korean medical science · doi:10.3346/jkms.1996.11.2.127 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sritharan, V., & Barker, R. H.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Barker, Robert H.
- Venue
- Molecular and Cellular Probes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 385-395
- ISSN
- 0890-8508 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067834899
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 8.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular and Cellular Probes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Keywords
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis, tuberculosis diagnosis, clinical samples, species identification, cultural comparison
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, Cell Extracts, DNA, Single-Stranded, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Polyethylene Glycols, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tuberculosis, DNA Probes, Polymerase Chain Reaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review