Cited by 150Malaria Research and ControlMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsBiosensors and Analytical Detection

A Simple Method to Detect Plasmodium falciparum Directly from Blood Samples Using the Polymerase Chain Reaction

Barker, Robert H., Banchongaksorn, Trairat, Courval, Jeanne M., Suwonkerd, Wannapa, Rimwungtragoon, Kamolwan, Wirth, Dyann F.·1992·The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Abstract

We have developed a simple method for treating blood samples permitting direct detection of Plasmodium falciparum parasites using the P. falciparum-specific DNA probe pPF14 after polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of target DNA sequences, and have compared this method with microscopic examination of thick blood smears. For PCR amplification, blood samples were lysed, then filtered onto filter paper. After drying, a piece of the filter paper was added directly to the PCR mixture for amplification. The presence of PCR products was detected using nonisotopically labeled probe. This method permits detection of less than than 10 parasites in a 20-microliters sample, and minimizes the effects of PCR inhibitors generally found in blood. Samples were collected from patients presenting at malaria clinics in Mae Sod and Mae Ramat, Thailand, and 626 were analyzed both by the PCR method and by conventional microscopy. Of these, 157 were positive both by microscopy and by PCR, while 297 were negative by both methods. PCR detected 131 samples that were negative by microscopy, and failed to detect 41 samples identified as positive by microscopy. All discordant samples were re-analyzed by microscopy and by PCR. Upon re-examination at a higher sensitivity, microscopy identified five additional positive cases, while six previously positive cases were found to be negative. This method of treating blood samples for PCR may also be useful in other diagnostic assays.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4269/ajtmh.1992.46.416

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PCR methods are generally more sensitive for detecting parasite DNA than thick blood smear is for detecting parasites.

    “PCR methods to detect malaria infection were described more than two decades ago, and are generally more sensitive for detecting parasite DNA than thick BS is for detecting parasites [27,28].”

    From Diagnosing malaria in pregnancy: An update (2012) · cites this paper as [27]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barker, R. H., Banchongaksorn, T., Courval, J. M., Suwonkerd, W., Rimwungtragoon, K., & Wirth, D. F.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
1992-04
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
416-426
ISSN
0002-9637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2411788447
Cited by
148
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
13.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
Keywords
Plasmodium falciparum, malaria diagnosis, PCR inhibitors, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, DNA, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Plasmodium falciparum, Sensitivity and Specificity, Blotting, Southern, DNA Probes, DNA, Protozoan, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Malaria, Falciparum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review