Cited by 90Sleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchChild and Adolescent Health

Sleep problems in pediatric practiceClinical issues for the pediatric nurse practitioner

MINDELL, J, OWENS, J·2003·Journal of Pediatric Health Care

Abstract

Sleep problems are highly prevalent in children and adolescents, but often go unrecognized and untreated in clinical settings. The purposes of this paper are to provide pediatric nurse practitioners with an understanding of the impact of sleep problems on children, their families, and on clinical pediatric practice; examine clinical practice issues that pediatric nurse practitioners identify as important regarding pediatric sleep; and provide practical information on current resources available for pediatric nurse practitioners and their patients on the prevention and treatment of pediatric sleep problems. The discussion of these issues incorporates results from a needs assessment survey on pediatric sleep completed by 317 pediatric nurse practitioners who attended the April 2003 Annual Conference of the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0891-5245(03)00215-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When disorders of arousal episodes are highly predictable, arousing the patient 15-20 min prior to the usual onset of a typical episode for 1 to 4 weeks may induce sustained positive results, at least in children with sleepwalking, sleep terrors, or confusional arousals.

    “When the occurrence of DoA episodes is highly predictable, arousing the patient 15–20 min prior to the usual onset of a typical episode for 1 to 4 weeks may induce sustained positive results, at least in children with SW [131], ST [132], or CA [133,134].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MINDELL, J., & OWENS, J.
Affiliations
Saint Joseph's University (US)
Corresponding author
MINDELL, J
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Health Care
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-11
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
324-331
ISSN
0891-5245 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029083355
Cited by
90
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Health Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
Keywords
pediatric sleep problems, pediatric nurse practitioners, children and adolescents, sleep disorders, sleep therapy, family impact, needs assessment, clinical practice issues
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Attitude of Health Personnel, Child, Decision Trees, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Nurse Practitioners, Parents, Pediatric Nursing, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep Wake Disorders, United States, Prevalence, Needs Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review