Cited by 61Cognitive Abilities and TestingHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesPsychological Testing and Assessment

Neurobehavioral test performance in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Krieg, Edward F, Chrislip, David W, Letz, Richard E, Otto, David A, Crespo, Carlos J, Stephen Brightwell, W, Ehrenberg, Richard L·2001·Neurotoxicology and Teratology

Abstract

The third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) contained three computerized neurobehavioral tests from the Neurobehavioral Evaluation System (NES): simple reaction time, symbol-digit substitution and serial digit learning. The neurobehavioral data that were collected came from a nationally representative sample of adults 20-59 years old. Performance on the tests was related to sex, age, education level, family income and race-ethnicity. Performance decreased as age increased, and increased as education level and family income increased. Differences in performance between sexes, levels of education and racial-ethnic groups tended to decrease as family income increased. The relationship between age and performance on the symbol-digit substitution test varied by education level and by racial-ethnic group. The relationship between age and performance on the serial digit learning test varied by racial-ethnic group. Questionnaire variables that were related to performance on one or more of the tests included the reported amount of last night's sleep, energy level, computer or video game familiarity, alcoholic beverages within the last 3 h and effort. Persons who took the tests in English or Spanish performed differently on the symbol-digit substitution and serial digit learning tests. Performance on all the tests decreased as test room temperature increased.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0892-0362(01)00177-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mean SRT latencies reported in recent studies vary widely, ranging from 233 ms to nearly 400 ms.

    “However, mean SRT latencies reported in recent studies vary widely (Table 1), ranging from 233 ms (Krieg et al., 2001; Vincent et al., 2012) to nearly 400 ms (Bugg et al., 2006).”

    From Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time (2015) · cites this paper as Krieg et al., 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krieg, E. F., Chrislip, D. W., Letz, R. E., Otto, D. A., Crespo, C. J., Stephen Brightwell, W., & Ehrenberg, R. L.
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Environmental Protection Agency (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Krieg, Edward F
Venue
Neurotoxicology and Teratology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-11
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
569-589
ISSN
0892-0362 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064169736
Cited by
61
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurotoxicology and Teratology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
neurobehavioral performance, reaction time, Symbol Digit Substitution Test, cognitive aging, socioeconomic status, educational attainment, household income, racial and ethnic differences, sex differences, sleep, energy levels, alcohol consumption, language of test administration, NHANES III
MeSH terms
Adult, Black or African American, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Nutrition Surveys, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Serial Learning, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Mexican Americans, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review