Cited by 280Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Disability in depression and back pain

Chwastiak, Lydia A., Von Korff, Michael·2003·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

DOI 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00051-9

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO DAS II) is a new measure of disability based on the ICIDH-2 model of functioning and disability. This study evaluates the measurement properties of the WHO DAS II in two disorders commonly encountered in the primary care setting. Seventy-three patients with depression and 76 patients with back pain were interviewed at baseline and after 3 months of usual primary care. Internal validity, convergent validity, and responsiveness to change of the WHO DAS II were evaluated. The WHO DAS II had excellent internal validity and convergent validity in the primary care setting. The responsiveness to change of the WHO DAS II was comparable to that of the SF-36. The WHO DAS II appears to be a useful health status instrument for measuring the disability associated with both physical and mental disorders in the primary care setting. This instrument facilitates the use of the ICIDH-2 as a framework for evaluating activity limitations and participation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00051-9

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Untitled work
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
Validation and Utility of a Self-report Version of PRIME-MD<SUBTITLE>The PHQ Primary Care Study</SUBTITLE>
Spitzer, R. L. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.18.1737 · Cited by 9,802
Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease Study
Murray, C. J. L., & López, A. D. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07492-2 · Cited by 7,007
A Study of the Natural History of Back Pain: Part I
ROLAND, M., & MORRIS, R. (1983) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004 · Cited by 3,395
Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status
Kazis, L. E., Anderson, J. J., & Meenan, R. F. (1989) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015 · Cited by 2,401
The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions.
Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.875 · Cited by 2,224
Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study.
Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M. R., Bayliss, M. S., McHorney, C. A., Rogers, W. H., & Raczek, A. E. (1995) · PubMed · Cited by 1,734
Methods for assessing responsiveness
Husted, J., Cook, R. J., Farewell, V. T., & Gladman, D. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00206-1 · Cited by 1,543
Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures statistics and strategies for evaluation
Deyo, R. A., Diehr, P. H., & Patrick, D. L. (1991) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/s0197-2456(05)80019-4 · Cited by 1,369

Show all 47 references

Sorted by citations

Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Dworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Farrar, J. T., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Jensen, M. P., Katz, N. P., Kerns, R. D., Stucki, G., Allen, R. R., Bellamy, N., et al. (2005) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012 · Cited by 3,732
Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Turk, D. C., Dworkin, R. H., Allen, R. R., Bellamy, N., Brandenburg, N., Carr, D. B., Cleeland, C., Dionne, R., Farrar, J. T., Galer, B. S., et al. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.08.001 · Cited by 3,510
The Prevalence and Correlates of Adult ADHD in the United States: Results From the National Comorbidity Survey Replication
Kessler, R. C., Adler, L., Barkley, R., Biederman, J., Conners, C. K., Demler, O., Faraone, S. V., Greenhill, L. L., Howes, M. J., Secnik, K., et al. (2006) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.2006.163.4.716 · Cited by 3,886
Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
Üstün, T. B., Chatterji, S., Kostanjsek, N., Rehm, J., Kennedy, C., Epping-Jordan, J., Saxena, S., von Korff, M., & Pull, C. (2010) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.09.067231 · Cited by 1,851
DSM-IV Personality Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication
Lenzenweger, M. F., Lane, M. C., Loranger, A. W., & Kessler, R. C. (2007) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.019 · Cited by 1,352

See all 280

Psychometric properties of the twelve item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II) in Spanish primary care patients with a first major depressive episode
Luciano, J. V., Ayuso‐Mateos, J. L., Fernández, A., Serrano‐Blanco, A., Roca, M., & Haro, J. M. (2009) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2009.05.008 · Cited by 93
Evaluation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO DAS II) - German Version
Pösl, M. (2004) · Elektronische Hochschulschriften der LMU München (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München) · doi:10.5282/edoc.2533 · Cited by 3
Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO-DAS II) in Greek and its added value to the Short Form 36 (SF-36) in a sample of people with or without disabilities
Xenouli, G., Xenoulis, K., Sarafis, P., Niakas, D. A., & Alexopoulos, E. C. (2016) · Disability and health journal · doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.01.009 · Cited by 15
Psychometric properties of the WHODASH in rehabilitation
Pösl, M., & Stucki, A. C. (2007)
The World Health Organization Short Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO DAS-S): a tool for the assessment of difficulties in selected areas of functioning of patients with mental disorders
Janča, A., Kastrup, M. C., Katschnig, H., López-Ibor, J. J., Mezzich, J. E., & Sartorius, N. (1996) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/bf00783424 · Cited by 152
Utility of the twelve-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II) for discriminating depression “caseness” and severity in Spanish primary care patients
Luciano, J. V., Ayuso‐Mateos, J. L., Fernández, A., Aguado, J., Serrano‐Blanco, A., Roca, M., & Haro, J. M. (2009) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9566-z · Cited by 37
Psychometric properties of the WHODASII in rehabilitation patients
Pösl, M., Cieza, A., & Stucki, G. (2007) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9259-4 · Cited by 139
Evaluation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO DAS II) - German version disability in patients with musculoskeletal diseases, cardiovascular and general internal diseases, stroke, breast cancer and depressive disorder
Pösl, M. (2004)
Evaluation des World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II) – Deutsche Version – Funktionale Gesundheit und Behinderung bei Patienten mit muskuloskeletalen Erkrankungen, kardiovaskulären und allgemeinen internistischen Erkrankung
Pösl, M. (2005) · Physikalische Medizin Rehabilitationsmedizin Kurortmedizin · doi:10.1055/s-2005-917908
RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Research article The 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II): a nonparametric item response analysis
Luciano, J. V., Ayuso-mateos, J. L., Aguado, J., Fern, A., Serrano-blanco, A., Roca, M., & Haro, J. M. (2013)

Authors: Chwastiak, L. A., & Von Korff, M.
Affiliations: University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author: Chwastiak, Lydia A.
ORCID: Chwastiak, Lydia A.
Venue: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2003-06
Volume: 56
Issue: 6
Pages: 507-514
ISSN: 0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00051-9
OpenAlex: W2058879410
Cited by: 280
References: 47
Citations by year: 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
FWCI: 18.58
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords: WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II, disability assessment, depression, back pain, functioning and disability, internal validity, convergent validity, responsiveness to change, SF-36, primary care, health assessment, activity limitation, participation
MeSH terms: Adult, Back Pain, Depressive Disorder, Disability Evaluation, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Services Research, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Washington, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Disability in depression and back pain

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks