The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistical assessment of ordinal outcomes in comparative studies
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods
Walker, E. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488486 · Cited by 8,538
The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods
Melzack, R. (1975) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5 · Cited by 6,845
Regression Models for Ordinal Data
McCullagh, P. (1980) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1980.tb01109.x · Cited by 4,453
Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire
(2007) · Encyclopedia of Pain · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-29805-2_3023 · Cited by 3,954
A Study of the Natural History of Back Pain: Part I
ROLAND, M., & MORRIS, R. (1983) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004 · Cited by 3,395
Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire
Fairbank, J. C. T., Couper, J., Davies, J. B., & O'Brien, J. P. (2020) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t04205-000 · Cited by 2,033
The Analysis of Cross-Classified Categorical Data
Drane, J. W. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1979.10489789 · Cited by 1,941
Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression.
Brant, R. (1990) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532457 · Cited by 1,864
Estimation of the probability of an event as a function of several independent variables
WALKER, S. H., & DUNCAN, D. B. (1967) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/54.1-2.167 · Cited by 1,682
Cited by
Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087 · Cited by 6,911
Fairbank, J. C. T., & Pynsent, P. B. (2000) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017 · Cited by 5,851
Development and validation of the short grit scale (grit-s)
Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223890802634290 · Cited by 3,376
Linehan, M. M., Comtois, K. A., Murray, A. M., Brown, M. Z., Gallop, R. J., Heard, H. L., Korslund, K. E., Tutek, D. A., Reynolds, S. K., & Lindenboim, N. (2006) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.7.757 · Cited by 2,025
There’s No Place Like Home: An Evaluation of Early Supported Discharge for Stroke
Mayo, N. E., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Côté, R., Gayton, D., Carlton, J., Buttery, J., & Tamblyn, R. (2000) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.31.5.1016 · Cited by 395
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott, S. C., Goldberg, M. S., & Mayo, N. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-55
- ISSN
- 0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016383017
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 10.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical assessment of ordinal outcomes in comparative studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00312-5
- The paper
- Scott, S. C., Goldberg, M. S., & Mayo, N. E. (1997). Statistical assessment of ordinal outcomes in comparative studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00312-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
