The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proposal and implementation of the “science SQC” quality control principle
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While manufacturing in workshops is being transformed thanks to digital engineering, the engineering capability in manufacturing workshops drops often to weaken scientific production control for quality incorporation in processes (Amasaka ed., 2003).”
From New Japan Production Model, An Advanced Production Management Principle - Key To Strategic Implementation Of New JIT (2011) · cites this paper as Amasaka ed., 2003
In the citing paper
“Introduction of T-QCIS has improved the Cm (machine capability) and Cp (process capability) of the overall vehicle production line as expected (Amasaka ed., 2003).”
From New Japan Production Model, An Advanced Production Management Principle - Key To Strategic Implementation Of New JIT (2011) · cites this paper as Amasaka ed., 2003
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Amasaka, 2000, A demonstrative study of a new SQC concept and procedure in the manufacturing industry Establishment of a new technical method for conducting scientific SQC, Mathl. Comput. Modelling, 31, 1, 10.1016/S0895-7177(00)00067-4 · DOI
- Amasaka, 1999, The promotion of new SQC internal education in Toyota Motor—A proposal of “science SQC” for improving the principle of TQM, European J. Engineering Education on Maintenance, Reliability, Risk Analysis and Safety, 24, 259
- Amasaka, 1999, Studies on “design SQC” with the application of “science SQC”—Improvement of business process method for automotive profile design, Japanese J. of Sensory Evaluation, 3, 21, 10.9763/jjsse.3.21 · DOI
- Amasaka, 1999, A proposal of the new SQC education for quality management—A proposal of “science SQC” for improving the principle of TQM, J. Japanese Soc. Quality Control, 29, 6
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Amasaka, K. (2011) · International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER) · doi:10.19030/iber.v6i7.3387 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Amasaka, K.
- Affiliations
- Aoyama Gakuin University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Amasaka, K.
- ORCID
- Amasaka, K.
- Venue
- Mathematical and Computer Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 11-13
- Pages
- 1125-1136
- ISSN
- 0895-7177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089200413
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 13 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Mathematical and Computer Modelling (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management Systems and Quality Improvement
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
- Keywords
- statistical quality control, total quality management, Toyota, quality control methodology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
