Cited by 184Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsAxon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling

Filopodia, spines, and the generation of synaptic diversity

Open access
Jontes, James D, Smith, Stephen J·2000·Neuron

Abstract

Central nervous systems are bewilderingly complex, containing enormous numbers of cells that are connected by an even greater number of synapses. Moreover, the brains of no two vertebrate conspecifics are exactly alike, differing in the numbers and positions of their cells and the patterns of their synaptic connections. Despite this heterogeneity at the cellular and subcellular levels, brains are not disorganized masses of neural tissue, but are reproducibly organized into highly stereotyped functional systems that have been preserved throughout evolutionary history. The questions confronting the neurobiologist include two important and related issues: how nervous systems are constructed during development, generating a conserved architecture from a heterogeneous substrate, and how changes in mature neural circuits are related to the remodeling events that characterize neural development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00003-9

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spine motility permits the sampling of large numbers of potential presynaptic partners before connections are stabilized via activity-dependent mechanisms.

    “This would be advantageous, because spine motility permits the sampling of large numbers of potential presynaptic partners before connections are stabilized via activity-dependent mechanisms (Jontes and Smith, 2000; Portera-Cailliau et al., 2003).”

    From The E3 ubiquitin ligase IDOL regulates synaptic ApoER2 levels and is important for plasticity and learning (2017) · cites this paper as Jontes and Smith, 2000

    In the discussion of divergent roles for filopodia and spines (page unavailable), the paper assigns broad sampling of potential inputs to motile filopodia. It says new spines instead appear preferentially associated with previously active presynaptic boutons, strengthening an existing connection—not sampling many potential partners. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. [1]1. Allison, D.W ∙ Gelfand, V.I ∙ Spector, I ... J. Neurosci. 1998; 18:2423-2436 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  2. [2]2. Carlier, M.F ∙ Pantaloni, D J. Mol. Biol. 1997; 269:459-467 Crossref Scopus (261) PubMed Google Scholar
  3. [3]3. Constantine-Paton, M ∙ Cline, H.T Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1998; 8:139-148 Crossref Scopus (197) PubMed Google Scholar
  4. [4]4. Dailey, M.E ∙ Smith, S.J J. Neurosci. 1996; 16:2983-2994 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  5. [5]5. Engert, F ∙ Bonhoeffer, T Nature. 1999; 399:66-70 Crossref Scopus (1421) PubMed Google Scholar
  6. [6]6. Fiala, J.C ∙ Feinberg, M ∙ Popov, V ... J. Neurosci. 1998; 18:8900-8911 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  7. [7]7. Fischer, M ∙ Kaech, S ∙ Knutti, D ... Neuron. 1998; 20:847-854 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (813) PubMed Google Scholar
  8. [8]8. Goodman, C.S ∙ Shatz, C.J Cell/Neuron. 1993; 72(10):77-98 Full Text (PDF) Scopus (1030) Google Scholar
  9. [9]9. Halpain, S ∙ Hipolito, A ∙ Saffer, L J. Neurosci. 1998; 18:9835-9844 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  10. [10]10. Harris, K.M Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1999; 9:343-348 Crossref Scopus (433) PubMed Google Scholar
  11. [11]11. Jontes, J.D ∙ Buchanan, J ∙ Smith, S.J Nat. Neurosci. 2000; 3:231-237 Crossref Scopus (176) PubMed Google Scholar
  12. [12]12. Katz, L.C ∙ Shatz, C.J Science. 1996; 274:1133-1138 Crossref Scopus (2460) PubMed Google Scholar
  13. [13]13. Lendvai, B ∙ Stern, E.A ∙ Chen, B ... Nature. 2000; 404:876-881 Crossref Scopus (654) PubMed Google Scholar
  14. [14]14. Maletic-Savatic, M ∙ Malinow, R ∙ Svoboda, K Science. 1999; 283:1923-1927 Crossref Scopus (1028) PubMed Google Scholar
  15. [15]15. Mitchison, T.J ∙ Cramer, L.P Cell. 1996; 84:371-379 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (1327) PubMed Google Scholar
  16. [16]16. Saito, Y ∙ Murakami, F ∙ Song, W.-J ... Neurosci. Lett. 1992; 147:81-84 Crossref Scopus (30) PubMed Google Scholar
  17. [17]17. Saito, Y ∙ Song, W.-J ∙ Murakami, F J. Neurosci. 1997; 17:8792-8803 PubMed Google Scholar
  18. [18]18. Toni, N ∙ Buchs, P.-A ∙ Nikonenko, I ... Nature. 1999; 402:421-425 Crossref Scopus (859) PubMed Google Scholar
  19. [19]19. Wyszynski, M ∙ Lin, J ∙ Rao, A ... Nature. 1997; 385:439-442 Crossref Scopus (525) PubMed Google Scholar

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jontes, J. D., & Smith, S. J.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Stephen J
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-07
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
11-14
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067308061
Cited by
184
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
Keywords
filopodia, synaptic diversity, synaptic plasticity, neural development, neural circuit remodeling, dendritic morphology, brain heterogeneity, neural circuit organization
MeSH terms
Animals, Dendrites, Humans, Synapses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review