Cited by 388Neural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Temporal Interaction between Single Spikes and Complex Spike Bursts in Hippocampal Pyramidal Cells

Open access

Abstract

Cortical pyramidal cells fire single spikes and complex spike bursts. However, neither the conditions necessary for triggering complex spikes, nor their computational function are well understood. CA1 pyramidal cell burst activity was examined in behaving rats. The fraction of bursts was not reliably higher in place field centers, but rather in places where discharge frequency was 6-7 Hz. Burst probability was lower and bursts were shorter after recent spiking activity than after prolonged periods of silence (100 ms-1 s). Burst initiation probability and burst length were correlated with extracellular spike amplitude and with intracellular action potential rising slope. We suggest that bursts may function as "conditional synchrony detectors," signaling strong afferent synchrony after neuronal silence, and that single spikes triggered by a weak input may suppress bursts evoked by a subsequent strong input.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00447-0

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 47 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 388

Metadata

Authors
Harris, K. D., Hirase, H., Leinekugel, X., Henze, D. A., & Buzsáki, G.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Buzsáki, György
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-10
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
141-149
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112782685
Cited by
388
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 23
FWCI
5.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (MH12403, MH54671, NS34994)
  • Uehara Memorial Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
single spike, CA1 pyramidal neurons, spike timing, burst duration, spike amplitude, spike-timing-dependent plasticity
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Electrophysiology, Hippocampus, Male, Time Factors, Pyramidal Cells, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review