Cited by 49Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage Development and DisordersReading and Literacy Development

The need for awareness of aphasia symptoms in different languages

Paradis, Michel·2001·Journal of Neurolinguistics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0911-6044(01)00009-4

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paradis, M.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Paradis, Michel
Venue
Journal of Neurolinguistics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-04
Volume
14
Issue
2-4
Pages
85-91
ISSN
0911-6044 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012586156
Cited by
49
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Neurolinguistics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
aphasia, multilingual patients, phonological structure, morphosyntactic structure, linguistic redundancy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review